Author:
Kaplan Abdullah,Altara Raffaele,Manca Marco,Gunes Hacı Murat,Cataliotti Alessandro,Booz George W.,Zouein Fouad A.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Left atrial (LA) size is frequently assessed by posterior-anterior linear measurement of LA (LAD P-A) in the parasternal long axis to expedite examination. Aging, changes in body surface area, and several cardiovascular pathologies can affect aortic root (AoR) size, thereby affecting LA anatomical shape. We hypothesized that AoR dilatation influences LAD P-A and consequently correct assessment of LA size.
Results
We tested our hypothesis in a study of 70 patients with AoR diameter ranging from 2.7 to 4.8 cm. LA size assessed in parasternal long axis view as LAD P-A was compared to that with LA width and length acquired in the apical two and four chamber view. Simpson’s method of discs was used as standard measurement to assess LA volume.
We observed that LAD P-A in the parasternal long axis decreases when AoR diameter increases. Thus, the increase in LA size assessed in parasternal long axis did not correlate with the increase of LA volume. Further analysis revealed that a significant positive correlation was observed when LAV was plotted as a function of LAD P-A only for those with a normal size AoR. In contrast, LA volume increase correlated with LA diameters assessed in the apical two and four chamber view regardless of AoR size.
Conclusions
Our study documents that increases in AoR impact on the linear measurement of LA, resulting in an underestimated LAD P-A. LA size ought to be calculated from the apical two and four chambers view parameters, especially in patients with AoR dilatation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Panovsky R, Pleva M, Feitova V, Kruzliak P, Meluzin J, Kincl V, Novotny P, Vanicek J (2015) Left atrium assessment: the evolving role of MRI. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 16(10):671–680. https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000000155
2. Fang F, Lee AP, Yu CM (2014) Left atrial function in heart failure with impaired and preserved ejection fraction. Curr Opin Cardiol 29(5):430–436. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000000091
3. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Goldstein SA, Kuznetsova T, Lancellotti P, Muraru D, Picard MH, Rietzschel ER, Rudski L, Spencer KT, Tsang W, Voigt JU (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28(1):1–39 e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003
4. Kaplan A, Gurdal A, Akdeniz C, Kiraslan O, Bilge AK (2014) The relationship between left atrial volume and ventricular arrhythmias in the patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Int Cardiovasc Res J 8(1):18–23
5. Ho SY, McCarthy KP, Faletra FF (2011) Anatomy of the left atrium for interventional echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 12(10):i11–i15. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jer093