Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
This study explores the trend of urolithiasis in various countries and categorizes the countries in terms of how their urolithiasis incidence rate has changed over time.
Methods
The incidence rate of urolithiasis in 204 countries from 1990 to 2019, extracted from the Global Burden of Disease study, has been analyzed.
Results
According to the results, all regions had experienced an increasing trend in urolithiasis rate, except for Eastern Europe, Central Europe, and Southeast Asia regions (decreasing rates of -71.4, -56.2, and -9.2 per 100000, respectively). Moreover, the Caribbean region had the highest increasing trend of urolithiasis rates, and Central Asia was in the next rank (increasing rate of 48.3 and 34.3 per 100,000, respectively, p-value < .05). Also, African regions revealed significant increasing trends over time (p-value < 0.05). The outstanding findings in cluster analysis showed that Afghanistan, Andorra, and Comoros had the most decreasing trend in urolithiasis rates over time (decreasing rate of -128.2 per 100000, p-value < .001). Cuba, Cyprus, Czechia, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Denmark, and Djibouti were in the next rank in terms of decreasing rate (decreasing rate of -92.3 per 100000, p-value < .001). In addition, urolithiasis rates in Congo, Eswatini, Gabon, and Grenada have the most increasing trend (increasing rate of 116.1 per 100000, p-value < .001).
Conclusion
The trend of urolithiasis rates was significantly increased in most countries, and Congo, Eswatini, Gabon, and Grenada had the highest trend among others. Also, Afghanistan, Andorra, and Comoros revealed the most decreasing rates, and the trend has dropped remarkably in several other countries.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Urology,Reproductive Medicine,General Medicine
Reference34 articles.
1. Alatab S, Pourmand G, El Howairis MEF, Buchholz N, Najafi I, Pourmand MR, et al. National profiles of urinary calculi (a comparison between developing and developed worlds). 2016.
2. Thongprayoon C, Krambeck AE, Rule AD. Determining the true burden of kidney stone disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16(12):736–46.
3. Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS, Project UDiA. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012;62(1):160–5.
4. Khan S, Pearle M, Robertson W, Gambaro G, Canales B, Doizi S, et al. 879 Tiselius HG Kidney stones. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2(16008):880.
5. Shajari A, Sanjerehei MM. Modeling the distribution of urolithiasis prevalence under projected climate change in Iran. Urolithiasis. 2015;43(4):339–47.