Author:
Gu Jianglin,Luo Shengjun,Jiang Li,Hu Daixing,Zhao Guozhi,Tang Wei
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
The original S.O.L.V.E. scoring system was modified using virtual reality technology, and a new H.L.P.E.S scoring system was constructed to improve the accuracy of predicting the stone-free rate after flexible ureteroscopy.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed clinical and virtual reality data of 150 patients with renal calculi who underwent flexible ureteroscopy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China, from September 2019 to January 2022. Factors affecting the stone-free rate were evaluated in univariate and multiple logical regression analyses. Factors were divided by cut-off value under the receiver-operating characteristic curve and scored accordingly to a well-known international scoring system. Area under the curve predicted the stone-free rate. The accuracy and superiority of the stone-free rate after flexible ureterorenoscopy was compared between this scoring system and the S.O.L.V.E, R.I.R.S, T.O.HO, and RUSS scores.
Results
Multiple logistic regression showed that the stone surface area, renal pelvis volume, and length of the calyces funnel were correlated with stone-free rate (P < 0.01, P = 0.021, P = 0.019, respectively). The H.L.P.E.S. score included stone surface area (1–2 points), renal pelvis volume (1–2 points), length of calyces funnel (1–2 points), pelvic calyceal height (1–2 points), and essence of stone (1–2 points). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of H.L.P.E.S. score was 0.927, which was higher than the S.O.L.V.E., R.I.R.S., T.O.HO, and RUSS scores.
Conclusion
H.L.P.E.S. scoring can effectively predict the stone-free rate after flexible ureteroscopy for renal calculi and is superior to other scoring systems.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Urology,Reproductive Medicine,General Medicine
Reference22 articles.
1. Zeng G, Mai Z, Xia S, et al. Prevalence of kidney stones in China: an ultrasonography based cross-sectional study. BJU Int. 2017;120:109–16.
2. Türk C, Neisius A, Petřík A, Seitz C, Thomas K, Skolarikos A. EAU guidelines on urolithiasis 2020 [European Association of Urology guidelines]. Edition: the European Association of Urology Guidelines Office; 2020.
3. Xu C, Song RJ, Jiang MJ, Qin C, Wang XL, Zhang W. Flexible uretero-scopy with holmiumlaser lithotripsy: a new choice for intrarenal stone patients. Urol Int. 2015;94:3–8.
4. Yamashita S, Kohjimoto Y, Iba A, Kikkawa K, Hara I. Stone size is a predictor for residual stone and multiple procedures of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery. Scand J Urol. 2017;51:159–64.
5. Sari S, Ozok HU, Topaloglu H, et al. The association of a number of anatomical factors with the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery in lower calyceal stones. Urol J. 2017 2; 14: 4008–14.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献