Author:
Liu Nachuan,Li Peng,Zhi Erlei,Yao Chencheng,Yang Chao,Zhao Liangyu,Tian Ruhui,Chen Huixing,Huang Yuhua,Yu Yuexin,Li Zheng
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To evaluate the clinical outcomes and the duration required for the sperm to return to the ejaculate after a modified single-armed 2-suture longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy (SA-LIVE).
Methods
From March 2015 to December 2018, 134 patients with epididymal obstruction azoospermia underwent the modified single-armed vasoepididymostomy at Shanghai General Hospital. The outcomes and clinical findings were documented and evaluated. The mean follow-up period was 17 (range: 3–36) months.
Results
Patency was assessed by the return of sperm in the ejaculate. The overall patency rate was 55.2%, and the patency rates were 58.9, 40.7, 36.4, and 58.9% for bilateral surgery, unilateral surgery, proximal anastomosis, and distal anastomosis, respectively. The average time to achieve patency was 4.11 ± 2.74 months. In the first 6 months, 87.8% (65/74) patency patients reported sperm in the ejaculate. The overall pregnancy rate was 40.9% (29/66) at the follow-up of 3–36 months, and the natural pregnancy rate was 30.3% (20/66). The natural pregnancy rate was 32.1% post-bilateral surgery and 33.3% for the site of distal anastomosis; surprisingly, it was 0% for the site of proximal anastomosis.
Conclusion
Modified SA-LIVE is safe and may achieve favorable patency and pregnancy rates. When double-armed sutures are not accessible, single-armed may be preferable. The expected patency time was within 1 year. Moreover, because of the low natural pregnancy rate for proximal anastomosis, sperm banking is preferred to SA-LIVE.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
Medical-Engineering(Science) cross-Research Fund of Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Urology,Reproductive Medicine,General Medicine
Reference22 articles.
1. De Kretser DM, Baker HW. Infertility in men: recent advances and continuing controversies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(10):3443–50.
2. Jarow JP, Espeland MA, Lipshultz LI. Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol. 1989;142(1):62–5.
3. Jungwirth A, Diemer T, Kopa Z, Krausz C, Tournaye H, Kelly B, Pal R. EAU guidelines on male infertility 2017; 2017.
4. Kolettis PN, Thomas AJ Jr. Vasoepididymostomy for vasectomy reversal: a critical assessment in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Urol. 1997;158(2):467–70.
5. Monoski MA, Schiff J, Li PS, Chan PT, Goldstein M. Innovative single-armed suture technique for microsurgical vasoepididymostomy. Urology. 2007;69(4):800–4.