Using Failure Mode, Effect and Criticality Analysis to improve safety in the cancer treatment prescription and administration process

Author:

Buja AlessandraORCID,De Luca Giuseppe,Ottolitri Ketti,Marchi Elena,De Siena Francesco Paolo,Leone Giovanni,Maculan Pietro,Bolzonella Umberto,Caberlotto Riccardo,Cappella Giovanni,Grotto Giulia,Lattavo Gaia,Sforzi Benedetta,Venturato Giovanni,Saieva Anna Maria,Baldo Vincenzo

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAdministering cancer drugs is a high-risk process, and mistakes can have fatal consequences. Failure Mode, Effect and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) is a widely recognized method for identifying and preventing potential risks, applied in various settings, including healthcare. The aim of this study was to recognize potential failures in cancer treatment prescription and administration, with a view to enabling the adoption of measures to prevent them.MethodsThis study consists of a FMECA. A team of resident doctors in public health at the University of Padua examined the cancer chemotherapy process with the support of a multidisciplinary team from the Veneto Institute of Oncology (an acknowledged comprehensive cancer center), and two other provincial hospitals. A diagram was drafted to illustrate 9 different phases of chemotherapy, from the adoption of a treatment plan to its administration, and to identify all possible failure modes. Criticality was ascertained by rating severity, frequency and likelihood of a failure being detected, using adapted versions of already published scales. Safety strategies were identified and summarized.ResultsTwenty-two failure modes came to light, distributed over the various phases of the cancer treatment process, and seven of them were classified as high risk. All phases of the cancer chemotherapy process were defined as potentially critical and at least one action was identified for a single high-risk failure mode. To reduce the likelihood of the cause, or to improve the chances of a failure mode being detected, a total of 10 recommendations have been identified.ConclusionsFMECA can be useful for identifying potential failures in a process considered to be at high risk. Safety strategies were devised for each high-risk failure mode identified.

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Pharmacy,Health Policy

Reference41 articles.

1. ASHP Council on Professional Affairs. ASHP guidelines on preventing medication errors with antineoplastic agents. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002;59:1648–68.

2. Umar RM, Apikoglu-Rabus S, Yumuk PF. Significance of a clinical pharmacist-led comprehensive medication management program for hospitalized oncology patients. Int J Clin Pharm. 2020;42:652–61.

3. European Medicines Agency. Medication errors. 2018 [cited 2022 Dec 5]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/post-authorisation/pharmacovigilance/medication-errors

4. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000 [cited 2022 Dec 5]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK225182/

5. Ministero della Salute. Raccomandazione per la prevenzione della morte, coma o grave danno derivati da errori in terapia farmacologica. 2008 [cited 2023 Jan 2]. https://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_675_allegato.pdf

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3