Development of a Malaysian potentially inappropriate prescribing screening tool in older adults (MALPIP): a Delphi study

Author:

Chang Chee TaoORCID,Chan Huan Keat,Cheah Wee Kooi,Tan Maw Pin,Ch’ng Alan Swee Hock,Thiam Chiann Ni,Abu Bakar Nor Azlina,Yau Weng Keong,Abu Hassan Muhammad Radzi,Rajan Philip,Tan Kar Choon,Ambigapathy Subashini,Vengadasalam Paranthaman,Zaman Huri Surina,Arvinder-Singh HS,Thum Chern Choong,Chung Wai Mun,Ooi Jun How,Sabki Noor Hamizah,Lee Hooi Peng,Mohd Shariff Siti Mallissa,Azman Muhammad Azuan,Teoh Siew Li,Lee Shaun Wen Huey

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) are common among older adults. To guide appropriate prescribing, healthcare professionals often rely on explicit criteria to identify and deprescribe inappropriate medications, or to start medications due to prescribing omission. However, most explicit PIM criteria were developed with inadequate guidance from quality metrics or integrating real-world data, which are rich and valuable data source. Aim To develop a list of medications to facilitate appropriate prescribing among older adults. Methods A preliminary list of PIM and potential prescribing omission (PPO) were generated from systematic review, supplemented with local pharmacovigilance data of adverse reaction incidents among older people. Twenty-one experts from nine specialties participated in two Delphi to determine the list of PIM and PPO in February and March 2023. Items that did not reach consensus after the second Delphi round were adjudicated by six geriatricians. Results The preliminary list included 406 potential candidates, categorised into three sections: PIM independent of diseases, disease dependent PIM and omitted drugs that could be restarted. At the end of Delphi, 92 items were decided as PIM, including medication classes, such as antacids, laxatives, antithrombotics, antihypertensives, hormones, analgesics, antipsychotics, antidepressants, and antihistamines. Forty-two disease-specific PIM criteria were included, covering circulatory system, nervous system, gastrointestinal system, genitourinary system, and respiratory system. Consensus to start potentially omitted treatment was achieved in 35 statements across nine domains. Conclusions The newly developed PIM criteria can serve as a useful tool to guide clinicians and pharmacists in identifying PIMs and PPOs during medication review and facilitating informed decision-making for appropriate prescribing.

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Pharmacy,Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3