Author:
Tan Qihua,Møller Anaïs Marie Julie,Qiu Chuan,Madsen Jonna Skov,Shen Hui,Bechmann Troels,Delaisse Jean-Marie,Kristensen Bjarne Winther,Deng Hong-Wen,Karasik David,Søe Kent
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Clinical trials have shown zoledronic acid as a potent bisphosphonate in preventing bone loss, but with varying potency between patients. Human osteoclasts ex vivo reportedly displayed a variable sensitivity to zoledronic acid > 200-fold, determined by the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50), with cigarette smoking as one of the reported contributors to this variation. To reveal the molecular basis of the smoking-mediated variation on treatment sensitivity, we performed a DNA methylome profiling on whole blood cells from 34 healthy female blood donors. Multiple regression models were fitted to associate DNA methylation with ex vivo determined IC50 values, smoking, and their interaction adjusting for age and cell compositions.
Results
We identified 59 CpGs displaying genome-wide significance (p < 1e−08) with a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 for the smoking-dependent association with IC50. Among them, 3 CpGs have p < 1e−08 and FDR < 2e−03. By comparing with genome-wide association studies, 15 significant CpGs were locally enriched (within < 50,000 bp) by SNPs associated with bone and body size measures. Furthermore, through a replication analysis using data from a published multi-omics association study on bone mineral density (BMD), we could validate that 29 out of the 59 CpGs were in close vicinity of genomic sites significantly associated with BMD. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis on genes linked to the 59 CpGs displaying smoking-dependent association with IC50, detected 18 significant GO terms including cation:cation antiporter activity, extracellular matrix conferring tensile strength, ligand–gated ion channel activity, etc.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that smoking mediates individual sensitivity to zoledronic acid treatment through epigenetic regulation. Our novel findings could have important clinical implications since DNA methylation analysis may enable personalized zoledronic acid treatment.
Funder
Sygehus Lillebælt
Syddansk Universitet
Astrid Thaysen Fund
Aase og Ejnar Danielsens Fond
National Institutes of Health
Region of Southern Denmark
Israel Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics (clinical),Developmental Biology,Genetics,Molecular Biology
Reference60 articles.
1. Russell RG. Bisphosphonates: the first 40 years. Bone. 2011;49(1):2–19.
2. Cremers S, Drake MT, Ebetino FH, Bilezikian JP, Russell RGG. Pharmacology of bisphosphonates. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;85(6):1052–62.
3. Langdahl BL. Overview of treatment approaches to osteoporosis. Br J Pharmacol. 2021;178(9):1891–906.
4. Ibrahim A, Scher N, Williams G, Sridhara R, Li N, Chen G, et al. Approval summary for zoledronic acid for treatment of multiple myeloma and cancer bone metastases. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(7):2394–9.
5. Lipton A, Fizazi K, Stopeck AT, Henry DH, Brown JE, Yardley DA, et al. Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(16):3082–92.