Abstract
AbstractAmong all the ambiguity resolution techniques, the Full Ambiguity Resolution (FAR), Partial Ambiguity Resolution (PAR) and Best Integer Equivariant (BIE) estimator are widely used. Although the researches have been done on the different classes of ambiguity resolution, we still hope to find the relationships among these specific algorithms. In this work, we unify the PAR and FAR algorithms under a whole framework of BIE by applying multiple integer candidates. A concise estimation formula of the variance of Gaussian BIE estimator based on the variance of float solution and the probability distribution of the candidates is first derived. Then, we propose an algorithm named Multiple Integer Candidates Ambiguity Resolution (MICAR) to discover as many ambiguities in the BIE as possible that can be estimated more precisely by PAR (FAR) algorithm instead of BIE. In the experiments, we utilize the simulated data of GPS (Global Positioning System) + BDS (BeiDou Navigation Satellite System) + Galileo (Galileo navigation satellite system) to contrast the effects of MICAR and single candidate estimator, i.e., FAR. By taking the threshold of 5 cm at 95% confidence level as an example, MICAR accelerates the convergence process by about 3.0 min. When the positioning sequence converges, MICAR reduces the root mean square of the positioning error by 9.8% in horizontal directions and 3.5% in vertical direction, which is attributed to more fixed NL.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Key Technologies Research and Development Program of Hubei Province
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. Betti, B. (1993). A geometric illustration of ambiguity resolution in GPS theory and a Bayesian approach. Manuscripta Geodaetica, 18, 317–330.
2. Bisnath, S., & Gao, Y. (2009). Current state of precise point positioning and future prospects and limitations. In Observing our changing earth (pp. 615–623). Springer.
3. Blewitt, G. (1989). Carrier phase ambiguity resolution for the Global Positioning System applied to geodetic baselines up to 2000 km. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 94(B8), 10187–10203.
4. Collins, P. (2008). Isolating and estimating undifferenced GPS integer ambiguities. In Proceedings of the 2008 national technical meeting of the institute of navigation (pp. 720–732).
5. Chen, H., Jiang, W. P., Ge, M. R., Wickert, J., & Schuh, H. (2014). An enhanced strategy for GNSS data processing of massive networks. Journal of Geodesy, 88(9), 857–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0727-7