Author:
Andersson Neil,Cockcroft Anne,Ansari Noor,Omer Khalid,Losos Joe,Ledogar Robert J,Tugwell Peter,Shea Beverley
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Household decision-makers decide about service use based largely on the costs and perceived benefits of health interventions. Very often this leads to different decisions than those imagined by health planners, resulting in under-utilisation of public services like immunisation. In the case of Lasbela district in the south of Pakistan, only one in every ten children is immunised despite free immunisation offers by government health services.
Methods/design
In 32 communities representative of Lasbela district, 3344 households participated in a baseline survey on early child health. In the 18 randomly selected intervention communities, we will stimulate discussions on the household cost-benefit equation, as measured in the baseline. The reference (control) communities will also participate in the three annual follow-up surveys, feedback of the general survey results and the usual health promotion activities relating to immunisation, but without focussed discussion on the household cost-benefit equations.
Discussion
This project proposes knowledge translation as a two-way communication that can be augmented by local and international evidence. We will document cultural and contextual barriers to immunisation in the context of household cost-benefit equations. The project makes this information accessible to health managers, and reciprocally, makes information on immunisation effects and side effects available to communities. We will measure the impact of this two-way knowledge translation on immunisation uptake.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference34 articles.
1. WHO State of the World's Vaccines and immunisation. [http://www.who.int/vaccines/en/sowvi2002text.shtml]
2. Bennett P, Calman K: Risk Communication and Public Health. 2001, London: Oxford University Press
3. Committee on Risk Perception and Communication, National Research Council: Improving risk communication. 1989, Washington, DC
4. Leask J: Vaccination and risk communication: Summary of a workshop. J Paediatr Child Health. 2000, 38 (2): 124-128. 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2002.00791.x.
5. Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Institute of Medicine: Overcoming Barriers to immunisation: a Workshop Summary. 1994, Washington, DC