Author:
Jackson Cath,Cheater Francine M,Harrison Wendy,Peacock Rose,Bekker Hilary,West Robert,Leese Brenda
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In the UK public concern about the safety of the combined measles, mumps and rubella [MMR] vaccine continues to impact on MMR coverage. Whilst the sharp decline in uptake has begun to level out, first and second dose uptake rates remain short of that required for population immunity. Furthermore, international research consistently shows that some parents lack confidence in making a decision about MMR vaccination for their children. Together, this work suggests that effective interventions are required to support parents to make informed decisions about MMR.
This trial assessed the impact of a parent-centred, multi-component intervention (balanced information, group discussion, coaching exercise) on informed parental decision-making for MMR.
Methods
This was a two arm, cluster randomised trial. One hundred and forty two UK parents of children eligible for MMR vaccination were recruited from six primary healthcare centres and six childcare organisations. The intervention arm received an MMR information leaflet and participated in the intervention (parent meeting). The control arm received the leaflet only. The primary outcome was decisional conflict. Secondary outcomes were actual and intended MMR choice, knowledge, attitude, concern and necessity beliefs about MMR and anxiety.
Results
Decisional conflict decreased for both arms to a level where an 'effective' MMR decision could be made one-week (effect estimate = -0.54, p < 0.001) and three-months (effect estimate = -0.60, p < 0.001) post-intervention. There was no significant difference between arms (effect estimate = 0.07, p = 0.215). Heightened decisional conflict was evident for parents making the MMR decision for their first child (effect estimate = -0.25, p = 0.003), who were concerned (effect estimate = 0.07, p < 0.001), had less positive attitudes (effect estimate = -0.20, p < 0.001) yet stronger intentions (effect estimate = 0.09, p = 0.006). Significantly more parents in the intervention arm reported vaccinating their child (93% versus 73%, p = 0.04).
Conclusions
Whilst both the leaflet and the parent meeting reduced parents' decisional conflict, the parent meeting appeared to enable parents to act upon their decision leading to vaccination uptake.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference54 articles.
1. Hilton S, Petticrew M, Hunt K: Parents' champions vs. vested interests: Who do parents believe about MMR? A qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2007, 7: 42-10.1186/1471-2458-7-42.
2. Health Protection Agency: Health Protection Report, 27 March 2009. 2009, London, UK: Health Protection Agency
3. World Health Organization European Region: Eliminating measles and rubella and preventing congenital rubella infection WHO European Region strategic plan 2005-2010. 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO
4. Health Protection Agency: Health Protection Report, 23 May 2008. 2008, London, UK: Health Protection Agency
5. World Health Organization European Region: Measles and Rubella Surveillance Bulletin 28 March 2008. 2008, Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO
Cited by
43 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献