Abstract
AbstractIn this study, the precursory seismic activity before a major earthquake was investigated by using the Pattern Informatics (PI) algorithm along the Sagaing fault zone (SFZ), Central Myanmar. After improving the earthquake catalog, the completeness of seismicity data with Mw ≥ 3.6 reported during 1980–2020 was used in retrospective testing to find the suitable parameters of the PI algorithm. According to the retrospective test with 6 cases of different forecast period times related to Mw ≥ 5.0 earthquakes, including verification using the relative operating characteristics (ROC) diagram, the characteristic parameters of both time intervals (change time and forecast time window) = 10 years and target forecast earthquake magnitude Mw ≥ 5.0 are suitable parameters for PI investigation along the SFZ. Therefore, these parameters were applied with the most up-to-date seismic dataset to evaluate the prospective areas of upcoming major earthquakes. The results reveal that the Myitkyina and the vicinity of Naypyidaw might be at risk of a major earthquake in the future. Therefore, effective earthquake mitigation plans should be urgently arranged.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Bertrand G, Rangin C (2003) Tectonics of the western margin of the Shan plateau (central Myanmar): implications for the India-Indochina oblique convergence since the Oligocene. J Asian Earth Sci 21:1139–1157
2. Chang LY, Chen CC, Wu YH, Lin TW, Chang CH, Kan CW (2016) A strategy for a routine pattern informatics operation applied to Taiwan. Pure Appl Geophys 173:235–244
3. Chen CC, Rundle JB, Holliday JR, Nanjo KZ, Turcotte DL, Li SC, Tiampo KF (2005) The 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake as a typical example of seismic activation and quiescence. Geophys Res Lett 32:L22315
4. Curray JR (2005) Tectonics and history of the Andaman Sea region. J Asian Earth Sci 25:187–232
5. Gardner JK, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bull Seismol Soc Am 64(1):363–367