Author:
Nayan Anveshi,Sarang Bhakti,Khajanchi Monty,Roy Nobhojit,Jesudian Gnanaraj,Menon Nandakumar,Patil Mulki,Kataria Raman,Manoharan Ravikumar,Tongaonkar Rajesh,Dev Ya,Gadgil Anita
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Surgical site infections (SSIs) affect around a third of patients undergoing surgeries worldwide, annually. It is heterogeneously distributed with a higher burden in low and middle-income countries. Although rural and semi-urban hospitals cater to 60–70% of the Indian population, scarce data regarding SSI rates are available from such hospitals. The study aimed to determine the prevalent SSI prevention practices and existing SSI rates in the smaller rural and semi-urban hospitals in India.
Methods
This is a prospective study performed in two phases involving surgeons and their hospitals from Indian rural and semi-urban regions. In the first phase, a questionnaire was administered to surgeons enquiring into the perioperative SSI prevention practices and five interested hospitals were recruited for phase two which documented the rate of SSIs and factors affecting them.
Results
There was full compliance towards appropriate perioperative sterilisation practices and postoperative mop count practice at the represented hospitals. But prophylactic antimicrobials were continued in the postoperative period in more than 80% of the hospitals. The second phase of our study documented an overall SSI rate of 7.0%. The SSI rates were influenced by the surgical wound class with dirty wounds recording six times higher rate of infection than clean cases.
Conclusions
SSI prevention practices and protocols were in place in all the less-resourced hospitals surveyed. The SSI rates are comparable or lower than other LMIC settings. However, this is accompanied by poor implementation of the antimicrobial stewardship guidelines.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference30 articles.
1. Getaneh T, Negesse A, Dessie G. Prevalence of surgical site infection and its associated factors after cesarean section in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May;20(1):311.
2. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR, Committee THICPA. Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 1999 Apr;20(4):247–80.
3. Bhangu A, Ademuyiwa AO, Aguilera ML, Alexander P, Al-Saqqa SW, Borda-Luque G et al. Surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: a prospective, international, multicentre cohort study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2018 May 1;18(5):516–25.
4. Singh S, Chakravarthy M, Rosenthal VD, Myatra SN, Dwivedy A, Bagasrawala I, Munshi N, Shah S, Panigrahi B, Sood S, Kumar-Nair P. Surgical site infection rates in six cities of India: findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC). International health. 2015 Sep 1;7(5):354-9.
5. Lobley SN. Factors Affecting the Risk of Surgical Site Infection and Methods of Reducing it. Journal of Perioperative Practice. 2013 Apr 1;23(4):77–81.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献