Author:
Abbey Joel,Jose Sherin,Percival David,Jaakola Laura,Asiedu Samuel K.
Abstract
AbstractBotrytis blight is an important disease of wild blueberry [(Vaccinium angustifolium (Va) and V. myrtilloides (Vm))] with variable symptoms in the field due to differences in susceptibility among blueberry phenotypes. Representative blueberry plants of varying phenotypes were inoculated with spores of B. cinerea. The relative expression of pathogenesis-related genes (PR3, PR4), flavonoid biosynthesis genes, and estimation of the concentration of ten phenolic compounds between uninoculated and inoculated samples at different time points were analyzed. Representative plants of six phenotypes (brown stem Va, green stem Va, Va f. nigrum, tall, medium, and short stems of Vm) were collected and studied using qRT-PCR. The expression of targeted genes indicated a response of inoculated plants to B. cinerea at either 12, 24, 48 or 96 h post inoculation (hpi). The maximum expression of PR3 occurred at 24 hpi in all the phenotypes except Va f. nigrum and tall stem Vm. Maximum expression of both PR genes occurred at 12 hpi in Va f. nigrum. Chalcone synthase, flavonol synthase and anthocyanin synthase were suppressed at 12 hpi followed by an upregulation at 24 hpi. The expression of flavonoid pathway genes was phenotype-specific with their regulation patterns showing temporal differences among the phenotypes. Phenolic compound accumulation was temporally regulated at different post-inoculation time points. M-coumaric acid and kaempferol-3-glucoside are the compounds that were increased with B. cinerea inoculation. Results from this study suggest that the expression of PR and flavonoid genes, and the accumulation of phenolic compounds associated with B. cinerea infection could be phenotype specific. This study may provide a starting point for understanding and determining the mechanisms governing the wild blueberry-B. cinerea pathosystem.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference67 articles.
1. Jones D, Percival D. Trends in lowbush blueberry cultivar development. J Am Pomol Soc. 2003;57(2):63.
2. Tirmenstein D. accinium myrtilloides. In: Fire Effects Information System. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory; 1990. https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/shrub/vacmyt/all.html. Accessed 21 Oct 2021.
3. [AAFC] Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Crop profile for lowbush blueberry in Canada, 2014. Catalogue No. A118–10/31–2014E-PDF. AAFC No. 12595E; 2017. https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.829861/publication.html. Accessed 20 Sept 2021.
4. Percival D. (2013). Wild blueberry yield potential and canopy management strategies. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the Wild Blueberry Producers Association of Nova Scotia; 2013. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/258821362. Accessed 20 Sept 2021.
5. Hildebrand PD, McRae KB, Lu X. Factors affecting flower infection and disease severity of lowbush blueberry by Botrytiscinerea. Can J Plant Pathol. 2001;23(4):364–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060660109506957.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献