Author:
Aazami Mohammad Ali,Rasouli Farzad,Ebrahimzadeh Asghar
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Salinity is one of the most challenging abiotic stresses restricting the growth of plants. In vitro screening will increase the efficiency and speed of salinity tolerant genotypes identifications. The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro to evaluate the seedlings growth, biochemical, and gene expression responses as well as the effect of nano zinc and iron on callus induction and plant regeneration.
Results
The results showed that an increase in salinity stress in the medium decreased the germination percentage, fresh and dry weight of shoot, root length, chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids content, K and Ca content, and on the other hand, Na content was increased. MDA content (‘Nora’, ‘PS-10’, ‘Peto’ and ‘Roma’: 1.71, 1.78, 1.66 and 2.16 folds, respectively), electrolyte leakage (‘PS-10’: 33.33%; ‘Roma’: 56.33%), were increased with salinity of 100 mM compared to control. Proline content was increased in 50 mM NaCl (10.8 fold). The most activity of antioxidant enzymes including CAT, SOD, APX, GPX, and GR was observed in the ‘PS-10’ cultivar, and the lowest activity of these enzymes was observed in ‘Roma’ under salinity stress. The AsA and GSH were decreased and DHA and GSSG were increased with the increased intensity of salinity. The relative expression of SOD, APX, and GR genes varied in different cultivars at different salinity concentrations. The most percentage of callus induction was observed with applying iron oxide nanoparticles, and the most regeneration rate was recorded using zinc oxide nanoparticles.
Conclusion
The results showed that salt-tolerant cultivars such as ‘PS-10’ with better osmotic adjustment, are suitable candidates for the future production and breeding programs. The use of nutrient nanoparticles under salinity stress for different tomato cultivars increased their performance.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference104 articles.
1. Cuartero J, Boları’n MC, Ası’ns MJ, Moreno V. Increasing salt tolerance in the tomato. J Exp Bot. 2006;57(5):1045–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erj102.
2. Amini F, Ehsanpour AA. Soluble proteins, Proline, Carbohydrates and Na+/Cl− changes in two tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cultivars under in vitro salt stress. Am J Biochem Biotechnol. 2005;1(4):212–6.
3. Tanveer K, Gilani S, Hussain Z, Ishaq R, Adeel M, Ilyas N. Effect of salt stress on tomato plant and the role of calcium. J Plant Nutr. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2019.1659324.
4. Ahmad P, Jaleel CA, Salem MA, Nabi G, Sharma S. Roles of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants in plants during abiotic stress. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2010;30(3):161–75.
5. Ahmad P, Singh VP, Deshmukh R, Corpas FJ, Tripathi DK. Revisiting the role of ROS and RNS in plants under changing environment; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.02.017.
Cited by
59 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献