Sub-optimal femoral fit in total knee arthroplasty, a systematic review of human femoral data vs off-the-shelf contemporary femoral components

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The purpose of the current study is to investigate the inadequacy of fit between the human distal femur and the knee implants offerings and describe the available strategies to overcome this issue. Methods A systematic research of the literature was performed to identify studies reporting morphologic measures of the distal femur. Studies were excluded if they included unhealthy knees or the morphological analysis did not report the two key dimensions to identify the patient’s unique anatomy: AP length and mediolateral (ML) width. Clinically relevant component overhang or underhang was considered when the metal-bone mismatch was > 3 mm as described in the literature. Results Six studies with anthropometric analysis of 1395 distal femurs met the inclusion criteria. The analysis revealed that by employing the available sizes of four current “state-of-the-art” primary off-the shelf (OTS) femoral implants up to 13–41% would show underhang and 9–27% overhang clinically relevant and the introduction of narrower sizes did not reduce this percentage of underhang but improved the overhang rate of 10–15%. Conclusions Whenever an ML/AP mismatch in encountered in the operating room, adaptations are needed, and these bring about deleterious biomechanical and clinical complications. Therefore, this study highlights the need for implants design with multiple ML offerings per AP size, since they provide not only more sizes options but more femoral shapes to match the different ML sizes of the distal femur, compared to designs with single ML offerings for a given femoral AP dimension.