Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to evaluate bar formation following physeal fracture with incarcerated periosteum or adipose tissue graft using radiographic and histological methods in an immature rabbit model.
Methods
Ten-week-old rabbits underwent induced proximal tibia physeal fractures with a contralateral sham. Fractures had periosteum (n = 5) or adipose tissue (n = 5) interposed. Radiographs were compared over time by tibial medial-lateral side difference (TMLSD)(mm), femoral-tibial angle and tibia plateau angle, and physeal bars evidence. MicroCT was performed, growth plates reconstructed, and physeal area calculated and normalized to same animal contralateral physes. Physeal disruption and chondrocyte organization were evaluated histologically.
Results
Radiographic: After 6 weeks, physeal bars formed in both periosteum (4 of 4) and fat groups (3 of 5). The periosteum group showed a significant increase in the TMLSD between immediate post-op and 10 days later (p = 0.028); but, after 6 weeks, TMLSD change was not significantly different between the three groups (p = 0.161). MicroCT: The normalized physeal area of every physis in the fat group was more than 0.9 (0.99 ± 0.06). Only half of the periosteum group was over 0.9 (0.81 ± 0.24). Histology: Physeal disruption was seen by microscopic evaluation in none of the sham group, all 4 in the periosteum group and 4 of 5 in the fat group.
Conclusions
Fat interposition may prevent, or at least delay, the onset of bars across a fractured physis compared to periosteum, but it is not completely protective.
Funder
Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America
Rady Children's Hospital - San Diego
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Reference25 articles.
1. Barmada A, Gaynor T, Mubarak SJ (2003) Premature Physeal closure following distal tibia Physeal fractures: a new radiographic predictor. J Pediatr Orthop 23(6):733–739
2. Chen J, Abel MF, Fox MG (2015) Imaging appearance of entrapped periosteum within a distal femoral Salter-Harris II fracture. Skelet Radiol 44(10):1547–1551
3. Clark A, Hilt JZ, Milbrandt TA, Puleo DA (2015) Treating proximal Tibial growth plate injuries using poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) scaffolds. Biores Open Access 4(1):65–74
4. Foster BK, John B, Hasler C (2000) Free fat interpositional graft in acute physeal injuries: the anticipatory Langenskiöld procedure. J Pediatr Orthop 20(3):282–285
5. Gruber HE, Phieffer LS, Wattenbarger JM (2002) Physeal fractures, part II: fate of interposed periosteum in a physeal fracture. J Pediatr Orthop 22(6):710–716