Author:
Pérez-Prieto Daniel,Pardo Albert,Fontanellas Albert,Gómez-Junyent Joan,Hinarejos Pedro,Monllau Joan-Carles
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The primary aim of the present study is to report the late acute hematogenous (LAH) prosthetic joint infection (PJI) cure rate following Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) treated by means of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in a long-term follow-up. The secondary purpose is to report the functional outcomes at that follow-up and to compare them with a non-infected group.
Material and Methods
This study cohort consists of 2,498 TKA performed from September 2005 to April 2010 that had a minimum follow-up of 10 years. The diagnosis of PJI and classification into LAH was done in accordance with the Zimmerli criteria. The primary outcome was the failure rate, defined as death before the end of antibiotic treatment, a further surgical intervention for treatment of infection, life-long antibiotic suppressive treatment or chronic infection. The Knee Society Score (KSS) was used to evaluate clinical outcomes.
Results
Ten patients were diagnosed with acute hematogenous PJI during the study period (0.4%). All of them were managed with DAIR, which was performed by a knee surgeon and/or PJI surgeon. The failure rate was 0% at the 8.5-year (SD, 2.4) follow-up mark. The KSS score was 82.1 vs. 84.1 (p n.s.) at final follow-up.
Conclusion
Although the literature suggests that TKA DAIR for LAH periprosthetic joint infection is associated with high rates of failure, the results presented here suggest a high cure rate with good functional outcomes.
Level of evidence
Level II, prospective cohort study.
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Reference28 articles.
1. Akgün D, Trampuz A, Perka C, Renz N (2017) High failure rates in treatment of streptococcal periprosthetic joint infection: results from a seven-year retrospective cohort study. Bone Joint. J 99-B:653–659
2. Barros LH, Barbosa TA, Esteves J, Abreu M, Soares D, Sousa R (2019) Early Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) in patients with suspected acute infection after hip or knee arthroplasty - safe, effective and without negative functional impact. J Bone Jt Infect 4:300–305
3. Bouvet C, Tchernin D, Seirafi M, Stern R, Lew D, Hoffmeyer P, Uçkay I (2011) No need to search for the source of haematogenous arthroplasty infections. Swiss Med Wkly 141:w13306
4. Choi H-R, von Knoch F, Zurakowski D, Nelson SB, Malchau H (2011) Can implant retention be recommended for treatment of infected TKA? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:961–969
5. Ghirardelli S, Fidanza A, Prati P, Iannotti F, Indelli PF (2020) Debridement, antibiotic pearls, and retention of the implant in the treatment of infected total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 30:34–41