Overdose prevention activities led by local public health departments, 2019–2023
-
Published:2024-06-04
Issue:1
Volume:19
Page:
-
ISSN:1747-597X
-
Container-title:Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy
Author:
Wisdom April,Haddad Stephanie,Govindu Madhumita,Higgins Francis,Filion Nikki,Sullivan Kate,Rooks-Peck Cherie
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Drug overdose deaths in the United States increased to historic levels in recent years, with provisional estimates indicating more than 111,000 deaths in the 12 months ending July 2023. In 2019, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Division of Overdose Prevention in collaboration with the National Association of City and County Health Officials, funded local health departments (LHDs) to work on overdose prevention activities. This paper aims to: 1) describe the overdose prevention activities that LHDs implemented during the four eighteen-month funding cycles; 2) identify programmatic successes and areas of opportunity for LHDs to consider when implementing future overdose prevention activities; and to 3) inform policy considerations and future overdose prevention programming at the local level.
Methods
We used programmatic data to identify overdose prevention activities implemented by 45 LHDs. Activities were double-coded according to the social-ecological model and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Overdose Prevention Strategies and Guiding Principles. We analyzed final codes to identify distribution and overlap of the Strategies and Guiding Principles across the social ecological model co-occurrences.
Results
Approximately 55.9% (n=123) of the 220 overdose prevention activities that were coded took place at the community level, 32.3% (n=71) at the individual level, 8.6% (n=19) at the relationship level, and 3.2% (n=7) at the policy level. Most of the activities were coded as coordination, collaboration, and integration (n=52, 23.6%), harm reduction (n=51, 23.1%), data and evidence (n=47, 21.4%) or reducing stigma (n=24, 10.9%). Few activities were related to primary prevention (n=14, 6.4%), equity (n=14, 6.4%), recovery support (n=11, 5.0%), and evidence-based treatment (n=7, 3.2%).
Conclusions
Localities have primarily implemented activities focused on the community and individual levels, with most of these centered around coordination, collaboration, and integration; harm reduction; or data and evidence. This study identified gaps in overdose prevention for LHDs related to treatment and health equity and that more interventions should be implemented at the relationship and policy levels. Continuing these efforts is important as LHDs explore opportunities to enhance and expand their work in various strategy areas across the social ecology. Findings from this study may be used to inform localities as they design and implement future overdose prevention activities.
Funder
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference17 articles.
1. Ahmad FB, Cisewski JA, Rossen LM, Sutton P. Provisional drug overdose death counts. National Center for Health Statistics. 2024. 2. Haffajee R, Sherry, TB, Dubenitz, JM, White, JO, Schwartz, D, , Stoller B, Swenson-O’Brien, AJ, Manocchio, TM, Creedon, TB, and Bagalman E. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Overdose Prevention Strategy (Issue Brief). 3. Krug EG, Mercy JA, Dahlberg LL, Zwi AB. The world report on violence and health. Lancet. 2002;360(9339):1083–8. 4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Social-Ecological Model: A Framework for Prevention. 2017;Available at:
https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/overview/socialecologicalmodel.html. 5. Jalali MS, Botticelli M, Hwang RC, Koh HK, McHugh RK. The opioid crisis: a contextual, social-ecological framework. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020;18(1):1–9.
|
|