Abstract
Abstract
Background
There has been a paradigm shift in the treatment of Hepatitis C (HCV) from the interferon-era to direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs. Cure of HCV for the key risk group, those with a history of injecting drug use, may provide a range of benefits to an individual’s quality of life that can be additional to that of a clinical cure. The interferon-era provided evidence that cure of HCV can be a turning point for those who use drugs, supporting a recovery journey. There remains a question if DAAs can provide the same opportunity.
Methods
We employed a scoping review methodology to consider the additional non-clinical benefits that HCV cure may provide. We used the theoretical construct of recovery capital to consider how these benefits may support a recovery journey in the DAA-era.
Results
Our search provided 2095 articles, from which 35 were included in the analysis. We developed a thematic synthesis of the non-clinical outcomes identified based on the four over-arching themes of recovery capital: physical, cultural, social and human capital. Our review suggests that identity change is a constituent part of each of the recovery capital domains in relation to HCV treatment.
Conclusion
We identified Social Identity Model Of Recovery (SIMOR) as a mechanism through which DAAs may provide non-clinical outcomes to increase recovery capital domains. Further research is required to develop an understanding of the impact a cure of HCV with DAAs may have on identity, overall health and wellbeing and social inclusion to support recovery journeys.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Health Policy
Reference73 articles.
1. Falade-Nwulia O, Sacamano P, McCormick SD, Yang C, Kirk G, Thomas D, et al. Individual and network factors associated with HCV treatment uptake among people who inject drugs. Int J Drug Policy. 2020;78:102714.
2. WHO. Guidelines for the screening care and treatment of persons with chronic hepatitis C infection: World health Organization; 2016.
3. European monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). Hepatitis C among drug users in Europe: epidemiology, Treatment and prevention. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2016.
4. Ashford RD, Brown A, Brown T, Callis J, Cleveland HH, Eisenhart E, et al. Defining and operationalizing the phenomena of recovery: a working definition from the recovery science research collaborative. Addict Res Theory. 2019;27(3):179–88.
5. The Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel. What is recovery? A working definition from the Betty ford institute. J Subst Abus Treat. 2007;33(3):221–8.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献