Author:
Foreman-Mackey Annie,Pauly Bernie,Ivsins Andrew,Urbanoski Karen,Mansoor Manal,Bardwell Geoff
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Novel public health interventions are needed to address the toxic drug supply and meet the needs of people who use drugs amidst the overdose crisis. Safer supply – low-barrier distribution of pharmaceutical grade substances – has been implemented in some jurisdictions to provide safer alternatives to the unregulated drug supply, yet no studies to date have explored professional stakeholder perspectives on this approach.
Methods
We used purposive sampling to recruit professional stakeholders (n = 17) from four locations in British Columbia, Ontario, and Nova Scotia, including program managers, executive directors, political and health authority representatives, and healthcare providers involved in the design, implementation, and/or operation of safer supply programs in their communities. Semi-structured, one-to-one interviews were conducted, and interview data were coded and analyzed using thematic analyses.
Results
Participants defined safer supply as low-barrier access to substances of known quality and quantity, offered on a continuum from prescribed to a legal, regulated supply, and focused on upholding autonomy and liberation of people who use drugs. Stakeholders expressed support for safer supply but explained that current iterations do not meet the needs of all people who use drugs and that implementation is limited by a lack of willing prescribers, stigma towards people who use drugs, and precarity of harm reduction programs to political ideology. Stakeholders expressed strong support for wider-reaching approaches such as decriminalization, legalization, and regulation of substances as a way to fully realize a continuum of safer supply, directly address the overdose crisis and toxic drug supply, and ensure equity of access nationally.
Conclusion
The results of this study highlight the need for innovative strategies to address the overdose crisis and that safer supply has the potential to benefit certain people who use drugs. A one-size-fits-all approach is not sufficient and the perspectives of professional stakeholders should be considered alongside those of people who use drugs when designing and implementing future safer supply.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Health Policy
Reference61 articles.
1. Special Advisory Committee on the Epidemic of Opioid Overdoses. Opioid and Stimulant-related Harms in Canada. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada [Internet]. 2021 Dec; Available from: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/substance-related-harms/opioids-stimulants.
2. Laing MK, Ti L, Marmel A, Tobias S, Shapiro AM, Laing R, et al. An outbreak of novel psychoactive substance benzodiazepines in the unregulated drug supply: Preliminary results from a community drug checking program using point-of-care and confirmatory methods. Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jul;93:103169.
3. Bowles JM, McDonald K, Maghsoudi N, Thompson H, Stefan C, Beriault DR, et al. Xylazine detected in unregulated opioids and drug administration equipment in Toronto, Canada: clinical and social implications. Harm Reduct J. 2021 Dec;18(1):104.
4. Statistics Canada. Provisional death counts and excess mortality, January 2020 to April 2021. 2021; Available from: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/210712/dq210712b-eng.htm.
5. Government of Canada. Measuring the impact of the opioid overdose epidemic on life expectancy at birth in Canada. Government of Canada [Internet]. 2020; Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/opioids/data-surveillance-research/measuring-impact-on-life-expectancy.html.
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献