Abstract
Abstract
Background
The use of illicit substances causes various health and social problems globally. Moreover, open drug use and dealing in urban areas, i.e., open drug scenes, can cause public order problems, lead to the recruitment of marginalized and young people for drug use or sale, and induce feelings of insecurity in the general public. Although some international studies have described various ways to manage open drug scenes, such as law enforcement and social interventions, there is limited knowledge about the facilitators and barriers promoting or impeding the implementation of such interventions. The aim of the current study was to explore how different authorities describe the nature of two open drug scenes in Stockholm and to derive authorities’ perspective on facilitators and barriers to implementing interventions to reduce open drug dealing, drug use, and related problems at these locations.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews with police officers, security staff, social workers, and municipality officials (n = 21) in the municipality of Stockholm were conducted and analyzed by qualitative content analysis.
Results
The analysis of the interviews generated the following categories: Problems, Interventions, Organizational factors, and External factors, revealing information about the strategic and daily counteracting work occurring at the open drug scenes as well as authorities’ perceptions of facilitators and barriers to implementing interventions to reduce open drug dealing, drug use, and related problems. Facilitators included motivated and skilled professionals and organized collaboration between key actors. Prominent barriers were a lack of resources to maintain personnel continuity at the scenes, policies that impede information sharing and put security staff in danger, and people who use or sell drugs without having residence permits.
Conclusions
To increase the possibility of successful implementation of interventions to counteract open drug dealing, politicians and authorities should pay attention to collaboration between key actors, sufficient resource allocation, possible modification of policy governing professional duties, and remedies to the vulnerability of individuals without residence permits.
Funder
Swedish National Council for Crime
Karolinska Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Health Policy
Reference37 articles.
1. Degenhardt L, Whiteford HA, Ferrari AJ, Baxter AJ, Charlson FJ, Hall WD, et al. Global burden of disease attributable to illicit drug use and dependence: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet (London, England). 2013;382(9904):1564–74.
2. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Drug supply reduction: an overview of EU policies and measures. Luxembourg: EMCDDA Papers, Publications Office of the European Union; 2017.
3. Bless R, Korf D, Freeman M. Urban Drug Policies in Europe Amsterdam: O + S; 1993.
4. van den Hock A. Epidemiology of HIV infection among drug users in Amsterdam. Amsterdam: Rodopi; 1990.
5. Bless R, Korf DJ, Freeman M. Open Drug Scenes: A Cross-National Comparison of Concepts and Urban Strategies. European Addiction Research. 1995;1(3):128–38.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献