Author:
Falzon Danilo,Carver Hannah,Masterton Wendy,Wallace Bruce,Sumnall Harry,Measham Fiona,Craik Vicki,Gittins Rosalind,Aston Elizabeth V.,Watson Kira,Hunter Carole,Priyadarshi Saket,Parkes Tessa
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Drug checking services (DCS) provide harm reduction support and advice to individuals based on chemical analysis of submitted substances of concern. Whilst there are currently no DCS in Scotland, community-based services are being planned in three cities.
Methods
In this paper, we report qualitative findings based on interviews with 43 participants, focused on perceptions of DCS and their implementation. Participants were relevant professionals, those with experience of drug use, and family members of those with experience of drug use. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to inform data collection and analysis. We report findings under nine constructs/themes across the five CFIR domains.
Results
Participants noted the importance of DCS being implemented in low-threshold, trusted services with a harm reduction ethos, and outlined a range of further service design considerations such as speed of testing, and information provided through the analysis process. In relation to the ‘inner setting’, a key finding related to the potential value of leveraging existing resources in order to expand both reach and effectiveness of drug trend communication. The approach of local and national police to DCS, and the attitudes of the public and local community, were described as important external factors which could influence the success (or otherwise) of implementation. Bringing together a range of stakeholders in dialogue and developing tailored communication strategies were seen as ways to build support for DCS. Overall, we found high levels of support and perceived need for DCS amongst all stakeholder groups.
Conclusions
Our findings present initial implementation considerations for Scotland which could be further explored as DCS are operationalised. Further, our focus on implementation contexts is relevant to research on DCS more generally, given the minimal consideration of such issues in the literature.
Funder
Drug Deaths Taskforce/Corra Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference93 articles.
1. Barratt MJ, Kowalski M, Maier LJ, Ritter A. Global review of drug checking services operating in 2017. 2018. Drug Modelling Program Bulletin No.24. Sydney, Australia: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW. Available online: https://ndarc.med.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/ndarc/resources/Global%20review%20of%20drug%20checking%20services%20operating%20in%202017.pdf Accessed 15th December 2023.
2. Barratt MJ, Measham F. What is drug checking, anyway? Drugs Habits and Soc Pol. 2022;23(3):176–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/DHS-01-2022-0007.
3. Barratt MJ, Kowalski M, Maier LJ, Ritter A. 2018. Profiles of drug checking services in 2017. Drug Policy Modelling Program Bulletin No.24. Sydney, Australia: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW. Availableonline: https://ndarc.med.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/Profiles%20of%20drug%20checking%20services%20in%202017.pdfAccessed 15th December 2023.
4. Van der Linden N, Koning RPJ, Gouwe D, Ventura M, Measham F, editors. 2022. Drug checking - from guerilla to government agent: the full spectrum of drug checking services. Special issue, Drugs, Habits and Soc Pol. 23(3).
5. Wallace B, Van Roode T, Pagan F, Phillips P, Wagner H, Calder S, Aasen J, Pauly B, Hore D. What is needed for implementing drug checking services in the context of the overdose crisis? A qualitative study to explore perspectives of potential service users. Harm Reduct J. 2020;17(1):2914. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-020-00373-4.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献