Planning and implementing community-based drug checking services in Scotland: a qualitative exploration using the consolidated framework for implementation research

Author:

Falzon Danilo,Carver Hannah,Masterton Wendy,Wallace Bruce,Sumnall Harry,Measham Fiona,Craik Vicki,Gittins Rosalind,Aston Elizabeth V.,Watson Kira,Hunter Carole,Priyadarshi Saket,Parkes Tessa

Abstract

Abstract Background Drug checking services (DCS) provide harm reduction support and advice to individuals based on chemical analysis of submitted substances of concern. Whilst there are currently no DCS in Scotland, community-based services are being planned in three cities. Methods In this paper, we report qualitative findings based on interviews with 43 participants, focused on perceptions of DCS and their implementation. Participants were relevant professionals, those with experience of drug use, and family members of those with experience of drug use. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to inform data collection and analysis. We report findings under nine constructs/themes across the five CFIR domains. Results Participants noted the importance of DCS being implemented in low-threshold, trusted services with a harm reduction ethos, and outlined a range of further service design considerations such as speed of testing, and information provided through the analysis process. In relation to the ‘inner setting’, a key finding related to the potential value of leveraging existing resources in order to expand both reach and effectiveness of drug trend communication. The approach of local and national police to DCS, and the attitudes of the public and local community, were described as important external factors which could influence the success (or otherwise) of implementation. Bringing together a range of stakeholders in dialogue and developing tailored communication strategies were seen as ways to build support for DCS. Overall, we found high levels of support and perceived need for DCS amongst all stakeholder groups. Conclusions Our findings present initial implementation considerations for Scotland which could be further explored as DCS are operationalised. Further, our focus on implementation contexts is relevant to research on DCS more generally, given the minimal consideration of such issues in the literature.

Funder

Drug Deaths Taskforce/Corra Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Health Policy

Reference93 articles.

1. Barratt MJ, Kowalski M, Maier LJ, Ritter A. Global review of drug checking services operating in 2017. 2018. Drug Modelling Program Bulletin No.24. Sydney, Australia: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW. Available online: https://ndarc.med.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/ndarc/resources/Global%20review%20of%20drug%20checking%20services%20operating%20in%202017.pdf Accessed 15th December 2023.

2. Barratt MJ, Measham F. What is drug checking, anyway? Drugs Habits and Soc Pol. 2022;23(3):176–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/DHS-01-2022-0007.

3. Barratt MJ, Kowalski M, Maier LJ, Ritter A. 2018. Profiles of drug checking services in 2017. Drug Policy Modelling Program Bulletin No.24. Sydney, Australia: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW. Availableonline: https://ndarc.med.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/Profiles%20of%20drug%20checking%20services%20in%202017.pdfAccessed 15th December 2023.

4. Van der Linden N, Koning RPJ, Gouwe D, Ventura M, Measham F, editors. 2022. Drug checking - from guerilla to government agent: the full spectrum of drug checking services. Special issue, Drugs, Habits and Soc Pol. 23(3).

5. Wallace B, Van Roode T, Pagan F, Phillips P, Wagner H, Calder S, Aasen J, Pauly B, Hore D. What is needed for implementing drug checking services in the context of the overdose crisis? A qualitative study to explore perspectives of potential service users. Harm Reduct J. 2020;17(1):2914. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-020-00373-4.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3