Abstract
AbstractThe increasing complexity of the migration pathways of health and care workers is a critical consideration in the reporting requirements of international agreements designed to address their impacts. There are inherent challenges across these different agreements including reporting functions that are misaligned across different data collection tools, variable capacity of country respondents, and a lack of transparency or accountability in the reporting process. Moreover, reporting processes often neglect to recognize the broader intersectional gendered and racialized political economy of health and care worker migration. We argue for a more coordinated approach to the various international reporting requirements and processes that involve building capacity within countries to report on their domestic situation in response to these codes and conventions, and internationally to make such reporting result in more than simply the sum of their responses, but to reflect cross-national and transnational interactions and relationships. These strategies would better enable policy interventions along migration pathways that would more accurately recognize the growing complexity of health worker migration leading to more effective responses to mitigate its negative effects for migrants, source, destination, and transit countries. While recognizing the multiple layers of complexity, we nevertheless reaffirm the fact that countries still have an ethical responsibility to undertake health workforce planning in their countries that does not overly rely on the recruitment of migrant health and care workers.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Public Administration
Reference20 articles.
1. Diallo K. Data on the migration of health-care workers: sources, uses and challenges. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(8):601–7.
2. Connell J. Migration and the globalisation of health care: the health worker exodus? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2010.
3. Hawthorne L. How valuable is “two-step migration”? Labor market outcomes for international student migrants to Australia. Asian Pac Migr J. 2010;19(1):5–36.
4. Spitzer DL. Precarious lives, fertile resistance: migrant domestic workers, gender, citizenship, and well-being. In: Çalışkan G, editor. Gendering globalization, globalizing gender: postcolonial perspectives. Don Mills: Oxford University Press; 2020. p. 142–58.
5. Hochschild AR. The nanny chain. Am Prospect. 2000;11(4):32–6.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献