Abstract
Abstract
Background
Inadequate leadership capacity compounds the world's workforce lack of preparedness for outbreaks of all sizes, as illustrated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Traditional human resources for health (HRH) leadership has focused on determining the health workforce requirements, often failing to fully consider the unpredictability associated with issues such as public health emergencies (PHE).
Main arguments
The current COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates that policy-making and relevant leadership have to be effective under conditions of ethical uncertainty and with inconclusive evidence. The forces at work in health labor markets (HLM) entail leadership that bridges across sectors and all levels of the health systems. Developing and applying leadership competencies must then be understood from a systemic as well as an individual perspective. To address the challenges described and to achieve universal health coverage (UHC) by 2030, countries need to develop effective HRH leaderships relevant to the complexity of HLM in the most diverse contexts, including acute surge events during PHE. In complex and rapidly changing contexts, such as PHE, leadership needs to be attentive, nimble, adaptive, action oriented, transformative, accountable and provided throughout the system, i.e., authentic, distributed and participatory. This type of leadership is particularly important, as it can contribute to complex organizational changes as required in surge events associated with PHE, even in in the absence of formal management plans, roles, and structures. To deal with the uncertainty it needs agile tools that may allow prompt human resources impact assessments.
Conclusions
The complexity of PHE requires transformative, authentic, distributed and participatory leadership of HRH. The unpredictable aspects of the dynamics of the HLM during PHE require the need to rethink, adapt and operationalize appropriate tools, such as HRH impact assessment tools, to redirect workforce operations rapidly and with precision.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Public Administration
Reference21 articles.
1. Chersich MF, Gray G, Fairlie L, Eichbaum Q, Mayhew S, Allwood B, English R, Scorgie F, Luchters S, Simpson G, Haghighi MM, Pham MD, Rees H. COVID-19 in Africa: care and protection for frontline healthcare workers. Global Health. 2020;16(1):46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00574-3.PMID:32414379;PMCID:PMC7227172.
2. Thompson L, Zwi AB. HRH in Public Health Emergencies in developing countries: an overview. Policy Note. Human Resources for Health Knowledge Hub and School of Social Sciences and International Studies, University of New South Wales. 2011. https://sph.med.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/sphcm/Centres_and_Units/PHEW_developing-countries_DraftPolicy.pdf.
3. WHO. Strategy on health policy and systems research: changing the mindset [Internet]. 2012. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/77942.
4. WHO. Open Mindsets: Participatory Leadership for Health [Internet]. 2016. Available from: http://www.who.int/alliance-hpsr/resources/publications/participatory-leadership/en/.
5. Williams GA, Maier CB, Scarpetti G, et al. What strategies are countries using to expand health workforce surge capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic? Eurohealth. 2020;26(2):51–7.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献