Regional inequalities and substitutability of health resources in the Czech Republic: a five methods of evaluation

Author:

Dlouhý MartinORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background An analysis of the regional distribution of health resources is one of the tools for evaluating equal geographic access to health care. The usual analytical approach to an assessment of regional differences is to evaluate each health resource separately. This is a sensible approach, because there may be systematic reasons for any differences, for example, higher salaries in urban areas. However, a separate evaluation of the regional distribution of health resource capacities may be misleading. We should evaluate all health resource capacities as a whole and consider the substitutability of resources. Objective This study aims to measure regional inequalities in the Czech Republic with the help of alternative approaches to the evaluation of regional inequalities in the case of several substitutable health resources. Methods Five alternative evaluation methods (models) are described and applied: the separate evaluation, expert model, market model, common weights model, and production frontier model. Results The regional distribution of physicians and nurses in the Czech Republic in 2017 was evaluated. In spite of many regulations at the national and regional levels, we have found inequalities in regional resource distribution. The models that consider all health resources and the possibility of a resource substitution show lower inequalities between regional health resource capacities. Conclusion Both researchers and policy-makers should always consider the possibility of resource substitutions in the assessment of regional inequalities.

Funder

Grantová Agentura České Republiky

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Public Administration

Reference32 articles.

1. Rice N, Smith PC. Ethics and geographical equity in health care. J Med Ethics. 2001;27:256–61.

2. De Looper M, Lafortune G. Measuring disparities in health status and in access and use of health care in OECD Countries. OECD Health Working Papers. No. 43. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2009.

3. Yu Q, Yin W, Huang D, Sun K, Chen Z, Guo H, Wu D. Trend and equity of general practitioners’ allocation in China based on data from 2012–2017. Hum Resour Health. 2021;19:20.

4. Munga MA, Maestad O. Measuring inequalities in the distribution of health workers: the case of Tanzania. Hum Resour Health. 2009;7:4.

5. OECD. Geographic variations in health care: what do we know and what can be done to improve health system performance? OECD Health Policy Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2014.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3