Author:
Fasaeiyan Niloofar,Soltani M.,Moradi Kashkooli Farshad,Taatizadeh Erfan,Rahmim Arman
Abstract
Abstract
Background
We present computational modeling of positron emission tomography radiotracer uptake with consideration of blood flow and interstitial fluid flow, performing spatiotemporally-coupled modeling of uptake and integrating the microvasculature. In our mathematical modeling, the uptake of fluorodeoxyglucose F-18 (FDG) was simulated based on the Convection–Diffusion–Reaction equation given its high accuracy and reliability in modeling of transport phenomena. In the proposed model, blood flow and interstitial flow are solved simultaneously to calculate interstitial pressure and velocity distribution inside cancer and normal tissues. As a result, the spatiotemporal distribution of the FDG tracer is calculated based on velocity and pressure distributions in both kinds of tissues.
Results
Interstitial pressure has maximum value in the tumor region compared to surrounding tissue. In addition, interstitial fluid velocity is extremely low in the entire computational domain indicating that convection can be neglected without effecting results noticeably. Furthermore, our results illustrate that the total concentration of FDG in the tumor region is an order of magnitude larger than in surrounding normal tissue, due to lack of functional lymphatic drainage system and also highly-permeable microvessels in tumors. The magnitude of the free tracer and metabolized (phosphorylated) radiotracer concentrations followed very different trends over the entire time period, regardless of tissue type (tumor vs. normal).
Conclusion
Our spatiotemporally-coupled modeling provides helpful tools towards improved understanding and quantification of in vivo preclinical and clinical studies.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference73 articles.
1. Smith RA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Brooks D, Doroshenk M, Fedewa S, Saslow D, Wender R. Cancer screening in the United States, 2015: a review of current American cancer society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2015;65(1):30–54.
2. Wahl RL. Principles and practice of PET and PET/CT. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
3. Samimi R, Kamali-Asl A, Geramifar P, van den Hoff J, Rahmim A. Short-duration dynamic FDG PET imaging: optimization and clinical application. Physica Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.11.004.
4. Soltani M, Moradi Kashkooli F, Souri M, Zare Harofte S, Harati T, Khadem A, Haeri Pour M, Raahemifar K. Enhancing clinical translation of cancer using nanoinformatics. Cancers. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13102481.
5. Soltani M, Souri M, Moradi Kashkooli F. Effects of hypoxia and nanocarrier size on pH-responsive nano-delivery system to solid tumors. Sci Rep. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98638-w.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献