Plantar pressure and falling risk in older individuals: a cross‐sectional study

Author:

Yan Yifeng1,Ou Jianlin1,Shi Hanxue2,Sun Chenming1,Shen Longbin1,Song Zhen23,Shu Lin245,Chen Zhuoming1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University Guangzhou China

2. School of Future Technology South China University of Technology Guangzhou China

3. School of Microelectronics South China University of Technology Guangzhou China

4. Institute of Modern Industrial Technology of SCUT in Zhongshan Zhongshan China

5. Pazhou Lab Guangzhou China

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundFalls are commonplace among elderly people. It is urgent to prevent falls. Previous studies have confirmed that there is a difference in plantar pressure between falls and non‐falls in elderly people, but the relationship between fall risk and foot pressure has not been studied. In this study, the differences in dynamic plantar pressure between elderly people with high and low fall risk were preliminarily discussed, and the characteristic parameters of plantar pressure were determined.MethodsTwenty four high‐fall‐risk elderly individuals (HR) and 24 low‐fall‐risk elderly individuals (LR) were selected using the Berg Balance Scale 40 score. They wore wearable foot pressure devices to walk along a 20‐m‐long corridor. The peak pressure (PP), pressure time integral (PTI), pressure gradient (maximum pressure gradient (MaxPG), minimum pressure gradient (MinPG), full width at half maximum (FWHM)) and average pressure (AP) of their feet were measured for inter‐group and intra‐group analysis.ResultsThe foot pressure difference comparing the high fall risk with low fall risk groups was manifested in PP and MaxPG, concentrated in the midfoot and heel (p < 0.05), while the only time parameter, FWHM, was manifested in the whole foot (p < 0.05). The differences between the left and right foot were reflected in all parameters. The differences between the left and right foot in LR were mainly reflected in the heel (p < 0.05), while it in the HR was mainly reflected in the forefoot (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThe differences comparing the high fall risk with low fall risk groups were mostly reflected in the midfoot and heel. The HR may have been more cautious when landing. In the intra‐group comparison, the difference between the right and left foot of the LR was mainly reflected during heel striking, while it was mainly reflected during pedalling in the HR. The sensitivity of PP, PTI and AP was lower and the newly introduced pressure gradient could better reflect the difference in foot pressure between the two groups. The pressure gradient can be used as a new foot pressure parameter in scientific research.

Funder

National Key R&D Program of China

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Reference38 articles.

1. WHO.WHO global report on falls prevention in older age. Geneva Switzerland.2007.https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43811/9789241563536_kor.pdf;jsessionid=6273F0199914A9F9EF6E7A0EF9428FD7?sequence=2.

2. Trends in Nonfatal Falls and Fall-Related Injuries Among Adults Aged ≥65 Years — United States, 2012–2018

3. Falls and Fall Injuries Among Adults Aged ≥65 Years — United States, 2014

4. The direct costs of fatal and non-fatal falls among older adults — United States

5. Medical Costs of Fatal and Nonfatal Falls in Older Adults

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3