Establishing regions of interest of the lower leg and ankle for perioperative volumetric assessment with a portable 3D scanner in orthopedic and trauma surgery – a pilot study

Author:

Taday Roman1,Schiffner Erik1,Gehrmann Sebastian Viktor2,Wilms Lena Marie3,Kaufmann Robert Alexander4,Windolf Joachim1,Latz David1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery University Hospital Düsseldorf Moorenstraße 5 40255 Düsseldorf Germany

2. Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery Katholisches Karl‐ Leisner Klinikum Albersallee 5‐7 47533 Kleve Germany

3. Department of Radiology University Hospital Düsseldorf Moorenstraße 5 40255 Düsseldorf Germany

4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery University of Pittsburgh Medical Center 3471 Fifth Avenue 15213 Pittsburgh PA USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundSoft tissue swelling assessment benefits from a reproducible and easy to use measurement method. Monitoring of the injured lower extremity is of clinical import during staged soft tissue management. Portable 3D scanners offer a novel and precise option to quantify and contrast the shapes and volumes of the injured and contralateral uninjured limbs. This study determined three regions of interest (ROI) within the lower extremity (lower leg, ankle and foot), that can be used to evaluate 3D volumetric assessment for staged soft tissue management in orthopedic and trauma surgery.MethodsTwelve healthy volunteers (24 legs) were included in this cohort study. Scans of all three ROI were recorded with a portable 3D scanner (Artec, 3D scanner EVA) and compared between the right and left leg using the software Artec Studio (Arctec Group, Luxemburg).ResultsMean volume of the right leg was 1926.64 ± 308.84 ml (mean ± SD). ROI: lower leg: 931.86 ± 236.15 ml; ankle: 201.56 ± 27.88 ml; foot: 793.21 ± 112.28 ml. Mean volume of the left leg was 1937.73 ± 329.51 ml. ROI: lower leg: 933.59 ± 251.12 ml; ankle: 201.53 ± 25.54 ml; foot: 802.62 ± 124.83 ml. There was no significant difference of the overall volume between right and left leg (p > 0.05; overall volume: △ difference: 29.5 ± 7.29 ml, p = 0.8; lower leg: △ difference: 21.5 ± 6.39 ml, p = 0.8; ankle: △ difference: 5.3 ± 2.11 ml, p = 0.4; △ difference: 16.33 ± 4.45 ml, p = 0.8.ConclusionThis pilot study defines three regions of interest of the lower leg and demonstrates no difference between the right and left side. Based on these ROI, further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical applicability of the scanner.

Funder

Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf. Anstalt öffentlichen Rechts

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Reference33 articles.

1. Reliability of Water Volumetry and the Figure of Eight Method on Subjects With Ankle Joint Swelling

2. Development and clinical evaluation of a computerized limb volume measurement system (CLEMS);Bednarczyk JH;Arch Phys Med Rehabil,1992

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3