Abstract
Abstract
Background
Ankle arthroplasty, commonly known as ankle replacement, is a surgical procedure for treating end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Whilst evidence shows good clinical results after surgery, little is known of the long-term survival of ankle replacements and the need for ankle revision. Using more recent implant data and long-term data, there is now opportunity to examine at a population-level the survival rate for ankle implants, to examine between-country differences in ankle revision surgery, and to compare temporal trends in revision rates between countries.
Methods
Four national joint registries from Australia, New Zealand, Norway and Sweden provided the necessary data on revision outcome following primary ankle replacement, for various periods of observation – the earliest starting in 1993 up to the end of 2019. Data were either acquired from published, online annual reports or were provided from direct contact with the joint registries. The key information extracted were Kaplan-Meier estimates to plot survival probability curves following primary ankle replacement.
Results
The survival rates varied between countries. At 2 years, across all registries, survival rates all exceeded 0.9 (range 0.91 to 0.97). The variation widened at 5 years (range 0.80 to 0.91), at 10 years (range 0.66 to 0.84) and further at 15-years follow-up (0.56 to 0.78). At each time point, implant survival was greater in Australia and New Zealand with lower rates in Sweden and Norway.
Conclusions
We observed variation in primary ankle replacement survival rates across these national registries, although even after 5 years, these population derived data show an 80% revision free survival. These data raise a number of hypotheses concerning the reasons for between-country differences in revision-free survival which will require access to primary data for analysis.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Reference33 articles.
1. Terrell RD, Montgomery SR, Pannell WC, Sandlin MI, Inoue H, Wang JC, et al. Comparison of practice patterns in total ankle replacement and ankle fusion in the United States. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(11):1486–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100713494380.
2. Vakhshori V, Sabour AF, Alluri RK, Hatch GF 3rd, Tan EW. Patient and practice trends in Total ankle replacement and Tibiotalar arthrodesis in the United States from 2007 to 2013. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(2):e77–84. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00526.
3. Tucker WA, Barnds BL, Morris BL, Tarakemeh A, Mullen S, Schroeppel JP, et al. Nationwide Analysis of Total Ankle Replacement and Ankle Arthrodesis in Medicare Patients: Trends, Complications, and Cost. Foot Ankle Specialist. 0(0):1938640020950181.
4. Daniels TR, Younger ASE, Penner M, Wing K, Dryden PJ, Wong H, et al. Intermediate-term results of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis: a COFAS multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(2):135–42. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01597.
5. Saltzman CL, Kadoko RG, Suh JS. Treatment of isolated ankle osteoarthritis with arthrodesis or the total ankle replacement: a comparison of early outcomes. Clin Orthop Surg. 2010;2(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2010.2.1.1.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献