Methodological and statistical approaches for the assessment of foot shape using three‐dimensional foot scanning: a scoping review

Author:

Allan Jamie J.1,Munteanu Shannon E.1,Bonanno Daniel R.1,Buldt Andrew K.1,Choppin Simon2,Bullas Alice2,Pearce Natalie3,Menz Hylton B.1

Affiliation:

1. Discipline of Podiatry School of Allied Health Human Services and Sport La Trobe University 3086 Melbourne VIC Australia

2. Advanced Wellbeing Research Centre Sheffield Hallam University S9 3TU Sheffield UK

3. La Trobe Library La Trobe University 3086 Melbourne VIC Australia

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe objectives of this study were to: (i) review and provide a narrative synthesis of three‐dimensional (3D) foot surface scanning methodological and statistical analysis protocols, and (ii) develop a set of recommendations for standardising the reporting of 3D foot scanning approaches.MethodsA systematic search of the SCOPUS, ProQuest, and Web of Science databases were conducted to identify papers reporting 3D foot scanning protocols and analysis techniques. To be included, studies were required to be published in English, have more than ten participants, and involve the use of static 3D surface scans of the foot. Papers were excluded if they reported two‐dimensional footprints only, 3D scans that did not include the medial arch, dynamic scans, or derived foot data from a full body scan.ResultsThe search yielded 78 relevant studies from 17 different countries. The available evidence showed a large variation in scanning protocols. The subcategories displaying the most variation included scanner specifications (model, type, accuracy, resolution, capture duration), scanning conditions (markers, weightbearing, number of scans), foot measurements and definitions used, and statistical analysis approaches. A 16‐item checklist was developed to improve the consistency of reporting of future 3D scanning studies.Conclusion3D foot scanning methodological and statistical analysis protocol consistency and reporting has been lacking in the literature to date. Improved reporting of the included subcategories could assist in data pooling and facilitate collaboration between researchers. As a result, larger sample sizes and diversification of population groups could be obtained to vastly improve the quantification of foot shape and inform the development of orthotic and footwear interventions and products.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Reference100 articles.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3