Author:
Charfi Rym,Guyonnet Cécile,Untrau Meiggie,Giacometti Gaëlle,Paper Thierry,Poyart Claire,Plainvert Céline,Tazi Asmaa
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is the leading cause of invasive infections in newborns. The prevention of GBS neonatal disease relies on the administration of an intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to GBS-colonized women. In recent years, rapid intrapartum detection of GBS vaginal colonization using real-time nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) emerged as an alternative to antenatal culture screening methods.
Methods
We compared the performances of two loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) tests, the Ampliflash® GBS and the PlusLife® GBS tests, to standard culture for GBS detection in vaginal specimens from pregnant women. The study was conducted from April to July 2023 in a French hospital of the Paris area.
Results
A total of 303 samples were analyzed, including 85 culture-positive samples (28.1%). The Ampliflash® GBS test and the PlusLife® GBS tests gave a result for 100% and 96.3% tests, respectively. The performances of the tests were as follows: sensitivity 87.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 78.3–92.6) and 98.7% (95% CI 93.0-99.8), specificity 99.1% (95% CI 96.7–99.8), and 91.9% (95% CI 87.3–95.0), respectively. False negative results of the Ampliflash® GBS test correlated with low-density GBS cultures. Time-to-results correlated with GBS culture density only for the PlusLife® GBS test (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Both techniques provide excellent analytical performances with high sensitivity and specificity together with a short turnaround time and results available in 10 to 35 min. Their potential to further reduce the burden of GBS neonatal disease compared with antenatal culture screening needs to be assessed in future clinical studies.
Funder
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Biosynex SA
Santé publique France
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Seale AC, Bianchi-Jassir F, Russell NJ, Kohli-Lynch M, Tann CJ, Hall J et al. Estimates of the burden of group B streptococcal disease worldwide for pregnant women, stillbirths, and children. Clin Infect Dis 2017 6;65:S200–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix664.
2. Plainvert C, de Saint Salvy-Tabet Y, Dmytruk N, Frigo A, Poyart C, Tazi A, Group B. Streptococcus (GBS) invasive infections in women of childbearing age, France, 2012–2020: GBS CC-17 hypervirulence in intrapartum infections. J. Infect. Dis. 2022 26;226:541–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiac076.
3. Verani JR, McGee L, Schrag SJ, Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease–revised guidelines from CDC, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Recomm Rep. 2010;19:59:1–36.
4. Schrag SJ, Verani JR. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease: experience in the United States and implications for a potential group B streptococcal vaccine. Vaccine 2013 28;31 Suppl 4:D20-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.056.
5. Nanduri SA, Petit S, Smelser C, Apostol M, Alden NB, Harrison LH, et al. Epidemiology of invasive early-onset and late-onset group B streptococcal disease in the United States, 2006 to 2015: Multistate laboratory and population-based surveillance. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;1:173:224. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4826.