Abstract
AbstractThe negative impact of hydropower companies is cushioned frequently through compensation that is proportional neither to the needs of communities nor to the energy business. Considering the dependence of hydropower on the environment, it is unclear how the good living of communities can be combined with the long-term sustainability of power companies. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to establish a benefit sharing scheme between hydropower companies and local communities. We conducted a systematic literature review using a sequential mixed-method approach. In the first stage, we performed a quantitative bibliometric analysis, and its results, described in Model 1.0, were the basis of the second stage. Consequently, in the second stage, we conducted a content analysis of 40 documents to enrich the previous version of the model in Framework 2.0. After completing both the methodological stages, we prepared a theoretical operational framework for benefit sharing based on collaborative governance that assigned different specific weights for companies and local communities. Equal benefit sharing is the result of an adaptive process that depends on (1) the performance of companies, (2) the level of empowerment of communities and (3) the state’s capacity to intervene in setting rules of engagement that help reduce power asymmetries between companies and the society.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Development,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference88 articles.
1. Samaniego JL (2014) La economía del cambio climático. In América Latina y el Caribe: paradojas y desafíos del desarrollo sostenible. Santiago de Chile. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/37791/LCM23_es.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2020
2. Polanco J, Ramírez F (2017) Evaluación de la sostenibilidad en empresas energéticas. Una investigación aplicada a centrales de generación hidroeléctrica. Universidad de Medellín & Isagen, Medellín
3. Marañón B (2014) Buen vivir y descolonialidad. Crítica al desarrollo y la racionalidad instrumentales. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpd.2015.03.010
4. Acosta A (2013) Buen vivir. Sumak Kawsay, una oportunidad para imaginar nuevos mundos. Ediciones Abya Yala, editor. Quito
5. Vanhulst J (2013) El Buen vivir : una utopía latinoamericana en el campo discursivo global de la sustentabilidad. P Rev Latinoam 12(36):497–522
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献