Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThis paper is related to the current stage of development in the Western Balkans. Despite becoming growing instruments to finance sustainable green development, debt swaps and social or sustainability bonds are relative novelties in this region. At the same time, the development needs are huge, especially in the light of the COVID-19 aftermath.ResultsThe review of both historic financial instruments, such as the debt for nature swaps, and more recent ones, such as sustainability bonds in its variations, highlight the potential for use in developing countries. The relatively recent case from Montenegro and the recent issuance of the green bond in Serbia showcase the possibilities. The focus of this paper is an analysis of the public debt position of Western Balkan countries. The growing level of public debt over the past decade points to a lack of adequate interventions and a relatively imminent need for fiscal consolidation. The research suggests that environmental, social, governance/sustainability-linked bonds and debt-for-climate swap investments as innovative financial instruments that hold promise in leveraging additional finance to support the sustainability goals of the six countries of the Western Balkans. This influx of capital would be particularly advantageous, given their needs relative to EU accession and their economic and structural challenges. The recommendations for policymakers are derived based on the history and features of green bonds as well as debt-for-nature swaps and their diverse underlying mechanisms which are adaptable to the respective countries.ConclusionsThe related countries would benefit from exploring more innovative approaches to finance sustainable societies. In close cooperation with the EU and taking the European Green Deal into consideration, it is recommended that the six countries of the Western Balkans design financing mechanisms that will bring increased transparency to the different policies and more accountability for their implementation. Applying the recommended modality may help keep the problem of the public debt at bay, while additional funds may support implementation of structural reforms.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Development,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference51 articles.
1. Cohen RL, Alfonso YN, Adam T et al (2014) Country progress towards the Millennium Development Goals: adjusting for socioeconomic factors reveals greater progress and new challenges. Glob Health 10:67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-014-0067-7
2. Barua S (2019) Financing sustainable development goals: a review of challenges and mitigation strategies. Bus Strat Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.94
3. UNSDG (2018) Local insights, global ambition. https://unsdg.un.org/resources/unlocking-sdg-financing-findings-early-. Accessed March 2021
4. Commission E (2019) The European Green Deal. Belgium, Brussels
5. SCF UNFCCC (2018) Executive Summary. In: Report on the 2018 Forum of the Standing Committee on Finance—climate finance architecture: enhancing collaboration, seizing opportunities. Standing Committee on Finance. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/2018SCFForumReport_Final.pdf. Accessed March 2021
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献