Author:
Drexler C. E.,Verse B.,Hauslbauer A.,Lopez J.,Haider S.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Applying the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) on socio-technical transitions, paired with the interdisciplinary framing approach, this paper investigates how incumbent actors of automobility in Germany framed the issue of a "transition of mobility and transport" ("Verkehrs/Mobilitätswende") in their public communication in 2020. We first identified representatives of industry, science, policy, and media, since the Verkehrs/Mobilitätswende and its implementation measures are contested among these actors. Employing qualitative content analysis, we then screened 325 public documents according to the elements of the framing approach problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and treatment recommendation.
Results
Findings show that most of the actors frame a transformation of transport and mobility as a necessity. Their arguments encompass environmental and climate-related issues as well as infrastructural problems for bikes and public transport caused by the hegemony of automobility. The actors propose a variety of solutions, primarily focusing on technical innovations for cars or on the expansion of different infrastructures to achieve a modal shift towards sustainable mobility.
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates that there is no common understanding of the problems and solutions to foster a mobility transition, as the diversity of problems and solutions proposed within the frame elements is high and complicates the prevailing implementation gap of the mobility transition. Therefore, MLP should be conceptually and methodologically bridged with the interdisciplinary framing approach, particularly with regard to the transition of mobility and transport.
Funder
Technische Universität Dresden
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Development,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference55 articles.
1. Grieco M, Urry J (2016) Mobilities: New perspectives on transport and society, 1st ed. Transport and society. Taylor and Francis, London
2. Kuhnimhof T, Nobis C, Hillmann K et al. (2019) Veränderungen im Mobilitätsverhalten zur Förderung einer nachhaltigen Mobilität: Abschlussbericht, Dessau-Roßlau
3. BMVI (2018) Mobilität in Deutschland - MiD: Ergebnisbericht, Bonn
4. Creutzig F, Jochem P, Edelenbosch OY et al (2015) Transport: a roadblock to climate change mitigation?: Urban mobility solutions foster climate mitigation. Science 350:911–912. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac8033
5. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit, (2020) Klimaschutz in Zahlen: Fakten. Trends und Impulse deutscher Klimapolitik, Berlin
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献