Abstract
Abstract
Background
Transport and mobility contribute a significant share of greenhouse gas emissions, and fossil fuel consumption must be reduced for mobility to meet sustainable development goals. Strengthening public transport is a key element of the required mobility transition, including technological innovation. To address the related institutionalisation processes, we analyse the interplay between technological development and the intensifying mobility transition debate. We focus on the challenges for the roles of public transport professionals, who are essential for the implementation of sustainable mobility measures at the local level.
Case selection and methods
We present two cases: First, we address urban ropeways as an incremental option to extend public transport networks. In a series of three expert workshops (23 participants in total), local public transport professionals discussed the potential of urban ropeways, and challenges concerning the related institutional framework. Second, we chose an exploratory approach to understand how public transport professionals engage in the debate on the potentially disruptive role of automated driving in the future of public transport. This included an analysis of strategy documents and experimentation, as well as observations at sectoral events and stakeholder forums. In both cases, we focus on the specific context in Germany, which ensures a coherent institutional framework and a consistent analysis.
Results
We found a general openness among public transport professionals to consider the potential of mature urban ropeway technology. However, critical gaps remain in planning instruments and the densely regulated public transport planning regime. Concerning automated driving, a strong technological focus can be observed in the related transport policy debate. At the local level, despite numerous technical tests, there is hardly any discussion of more far-reaching requirements regarding integration of the technology into the mobility system in a way that ensures sustainability-oriented goals are met.
Conclusions
Beyond both incremental and potentially disruptive technological drivers, the proactive and targeted design of corresponding institutionalisation processes proves to be a key challenge for achieving a sustainable mobility transition. Institutionalisation and the related roles of public transport professionals must be considered in relation to the mobility transition’s substantive goals and the associated political discourse.
Funder
Ministry of Transport Baden-Württemberg
Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts Baden-Württemberg
Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Development,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference74 articles.
1. Brand C, Anable J, Ketsopoulou I et al (2020) Road to zero or road to nowhere? Disrupting transport and energy in a zero carbon world. Energy Policy 139:111334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111334
2. Canzler W, Knie A (2018) Die Zukunft urbaner Mobilität—Ansätze für eine ökologische Verkehrswende im digitalen Zeitalter. böll.brief Grüne Ordnungspolitik, Berlin. https://www.boell.de/de/2018/04/16/die-zukunft-urbaner-mobilitaet-boellbrief-gruene-ordnungspolitik-6. Accessed 7 June 2018
3. Holden E, Banister D, Gössling S et al (2020) Grand narratives for sustainable mobility: a conceptual review. Energy Res Soc Sci 65:101454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101454
4. Fünfschilling L, Truffer B (2014) The structuration of socio-technical regimes—conceptual foundations from institutional theory. Res Policy 43:772–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010
5. Nobis C, Kuhnimhof T (2018) Mobilität in Deutschland—MiD. Ergebnisbericht. Studie von infas, DLR, IVT und infas 360 im Auftrag des Bundesministers für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur (FE-Nr. 70.904/15), Bonn, Berlin. http://www.mobilitaet-in-deutschland.de/pdf/MiD2017_Ergebnisbericht.pdf. Accessed 23 April 2019