From ambition to implementation: institutionalisation as a key challenge for a sustainable mobility transition in Germany

Author:

Reichenbach MaxORCID,Fleischer Torsten

Abstract

Abstract Background Transport and mobility contribute a significant share of greenhouse gas emissions, and fossil fuel consumption must be reduced for mobility to meet sustainable development goals. Strengthening public transport is a key element of the required mobility transition, including technological innovation. To address the related institutionalisation processes, we analyse the interplay between technological development and the intensifying mobility transition debate. We focus on the challenges for the roles of public transport professionals, who are essential for the implementation of sustainable mobility measures at the local level. Case selection and methods We present two cases: First, we address urban ropeways as an incremental option to extend public transport networks. In a series of three expert workshops (23 participants in total), local public transport professionals discussed the potential of urban ropeways, and challenges concerning the related institutional framework. Second, we chose an exploratory approach to understand how public transport professionals engage in the debate on the potentially disruptive role of automated driving in the future of public transport. This included an analysis of strategy documents and experimentation, as well as observations at sectoral events and stakeholder forums. In both cases, we focus on the specific context in Germany, which ensures a coherent institutional framework and a consistent analysis. Results We found a general openness among public transport professionals to consider the potential of mature urban ropeway technology. However, critical gaps remain in planning instruments and the densely regulated public transport planning regime. Concerning automated driving, a strong technological focus can be observed in the related transport policy debate. At the local level, despite numerous technical tests, there is hardly any discussion of more far-reaching requirements regarding integration of the technology into the mobility system in a way that ensures sustainability-oriented goals are met. Conclusions Beyond both incremental and potentially disruptive technological drivers, the proactive and targeted design of corresponding institutionalisation processes proves to be a key challenge for achieving a sustainable mobility transition. Institutionalisation and the related roles of public transport professionals must be considered in relation to the mobility transition’s substantive goals and the associated political discourse.

Funder

Ministry of Transport Baden-Württemberg

Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts Baden-Württemberg

Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Development,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Reference74 articles.

1. Brand C, Anable J, Ketsopoulou I et al (2020) Road to zero or road to nowhere? Disrupting transport and energy in a zero carbon world. Energy Policy 139:111334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111334

2. Canzler W, Knie A (2018) Die Zukunft urbaner Mobilität—Ansätze für eine ökologische Verkehrswende im digitalen Zeitalter. böll.brief Grüne Ordnungspolitik, Berlin. https://www.boell.de/de/2018/04/16/die-zukunft-urbaner-mobilitaet-boellbrief-gruene-ordnungspolitik-6. Accessed 7 June 2018

3. Holden E, Banister D, Gössling S et al (2020) Grand narratives for sustainable mobility: a conceptual review. Energy Res Soc Sci 65:101454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101454

4. Fünfschilling L, Truffer B (2014) The structuration of socio-technical regimes—conceptual foundations from institutional theory. Res Policy 43:772–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010

5. Nobis C, Kuhnimhof T (2018) Mobilität in Deutschland—MiD. Ergebnisbericht. Studie von infas, DLR, IVT und infas 360 im Auftrag des Bundesministers für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur (FE-Nr. 70.904/15), Bonn, Berlin. http://www.mobilitaet-in-deutschland.de/pdf/MiD2017_Ergebnisbericht.pdf. Accessed 23 April 2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3