Author:
Hurlbert Margot,Das Tanushree,Vitto Charisse
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Transforming power production systems to achieve net zero emissions and address climate change will require deep structural changes, partially dependent on community perceptions of the necessary energy transition. The article presents results from 2-day citizen juries held in four communities of Saskatchewan, Canada: Estevan, Swift Current, Regina, and Saskatoon in 2021/22 whose purpose was to determine if place attachment impacts future power production preferences and whether social learning can be achieved. Mixed research methods included a survey before and after the citizen juries and a qualitative analysis of the discussions and outputs.
Results
Research results confirm that while there are common concerns across communities about unbiased information, transparent decision-making, justice/equity concerns, and people's involvement, community-imagined energy futures can be very divergent. Not only place-based attachment, the existent industry and infrastructure surrounding the community impact preferences but also openness to learning and group dynamics contribute. Focused deliberations on the complex problem of climate change advance social learning.
The coal, oil, and gas community of Estevan supported coal, natural gas, and carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) to a substantially larger extent than other communities, even increasing their preference for coal after the citizen jury. Saskatoon chose Small Modular Reactors (SMR) as their top choice, whereas Swift Current switched from preferring natural gas to solar and SMRs.
Conclusions
The findings from the jury sessions suggest changing attitudes toward SMRs as a potential source of energy, as well as a shift from cost considerations to environmental. Future research implications could include differing methodologies and potentially partnering beyond academia. Jurors all expressed the desire for greater government leadership, urging the government to demonstrate accountability, hold large enterprises accountable, and be more proactive in bringing parties together.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Development,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference78 articles.
1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2023) Climate change 2021—the physical science basis: working group I contribution to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
2. Saskatchewan | The Canadian Encyclopedia. https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/timeline/saskatchewan. Accessed 28 Sep 2023
3. Hurlbert M, Osazuwa-Peters M, Rayner J, Reiner D, Baranovskiy P (2020) Diverse community energy futures in Saskatchewan, Canada. Clean Technol Environ Policy 22:1157–1172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01859-2
4. Government of Canada CER (2022) CER – Market Snapshot: Canada’s retiring coal-fired power plants will be replaced by renewable and low-carbon energy sources. https://www.cer-rec.gc.ca/en/data-analysis/energy-markets/market-snapshots/2020/market-snapshot-canadas-retiring-coal-fired-power-plants-will-be-replaced-renewable-low-carbon-energy-sources.html. Accessed 28 Sep 2023
5. Premiers Moe, Ford, Higgs to collaborate on development of nuclear reactors in Canada | Globalnews.ca. In: Glob. News. https://globalnews.ca/news/6241337/premiers-collaborate-nuclear-reactors. Accessed 28 Sep 2023