Abstract
Abstract
Background
Early identification of hereditary cancer risk would save lives, but genetic testing (GT) has been inadequate. We assessed i) trends for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), Lynch syndrome, and other GT and ii) factors associated with receipt of GT.
Methods
We used data from the Arkansas All-Payer Claims Database from January 2013 through June 2018 (commercial, Medicaid), December 2017 (state employee), or December 2016 (Medicare) and identified enrollees with ≥1 month of enrollment. Using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT-4) codes, rates for GT were calculated per 100,000 person-quarters and time series regressions estimated. Second, GT and covariate information for enrollees with 24 months of continuous enrollment were used to estimate separate logistic regression models for each GT category.
Results
Among 2,520,575 unique enrollees, HBOC testing rates were 2.2 (Medicaid), 22.0 (commercial), 40.4 (state employee), and 13.1(Medicare) per 100,000 person-quarters and increased linearly across all plans. Older age (OR=1.24; 95%CI 1.20 – 1.28), female sex (OR=18.91; 95%CI 13.01 – 28.86), higher comorbidity burden (OR=1.08; 95%CI 1.05 – 1.12), mental disorders (OR=1.53; 95%CI 1.15 – 2.00), and state employee coverage (OR=1.65; 95%CI 1.37 – 1.97) were positively associated with HBOC testing. Less than 1 of 10,000 enrollees received Lynch syndrome testing, while < 5 of 10,000 received HBOC testing.
Conclusion
GT rates for hereditary cancer syndromes have increased in Arkansas but remain low. Receipt of GT was explained with high discrimination by sex and plan type.
Impact
Expansion of GT for hereditary cancer risk in Arkansas is needed to identify high-risk individuals who could benefit from risk-reduction strategies.
Funder
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics (clinical),Oncology
Reference26 articles.
1. Hampel H, de la CA. The Search for Unaffected Individuals with Lynch Syndrome: Do the Ends Justify the Means? Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa). NIH Public Access. 2011;4:1.
2. Drohan B, Roche C, Cusack J, Hughes K. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and other hereditary syndromes: using technology to identify carriers. Annals of surgical oncology. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1732–7.
3. Manchanda R, Blyuss O, Gaba F, Gordeev V, Jacobs C, Burnell M, et al. Current detection rates and time-to-detection of all identifiable BRCA carriers in the Greater London population. J Med Genet. 2018;55:538–45.
4. Hall MJ, Obeid EI, Schwartz SC, Mantia-Smaldone G, Forman AD, Daly MB. Genetic testing for hereditary cancer predisposition: BRCA1/2, Lynch syndrome, and beyond. Gynecol Oncol Academic Press. 2016;140:565–74.
5. Evans DGR, Barwell J, Eccles DM, Collins A, Izatt L, Jacobs C, et al. The Angelina Jolie effect: how high celebrity profile can have a major impact on provision of cancer related services. Breast Cancer Research 2014 16:5. BioMed Central. 2014;16:1–6.