Abstract
Abstract
Background
Monitoring forage in livestock operations is critical to sustainable rangeland management of soil and ecological processes that provide both livestock and wildlife habitat. Traditional ground-based sampling methods have been widely used and provide valuable information; however, they are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and limited in their ability to capture larger extents of the spatial and temporal dynamics of rangeland ecosystems. Drones provide a solution to collect data to larger extents than field-based methods and with higher-resolution than traditional remote sensing platforms. Our objectives were to (1) assess the accuracy of vegetation cover height in grasses using drones, (2) quantify the spatial distribution of vegetation cover height in grazed and non-grazed pastures during the dormant (fall–winter) and growing seasons (spring–summer), and (3) evaluate the spatial distribution of vegetation cover height as a proxy for northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) habitat in South Texas. We achieved this by very fine scale drone-derived imagery and using class level landscape metrics to assess vegetation cover height configuration.
Results
Estimated heights from drone imagery had a significant relationship with the field height measurements in September (r2 = 0.83; growing season) and February (r2 = 0.77; dormant season). Growing season pasture maintained residual landscape habitat configuration adequate for bobwhites throughout the fall and winter of 2022–2023 following grazing. Dormant season pasture had an increase in bare ground cover, and a shift from many large patches of tall herbaceous cover (40–120 cm) to few large patches of low herbaceous cover (5–30 cm) (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
Drones provided high-resolution imagery that allowed us to assess the spatial and temporal changes of vertical herbaceous vegetation structure in a semi-arid rangeland subject to grazing. This study shows how drone imagery can be beneficial for wildlife conservation and management by providing insights into changes in fine-scale vegetation spatial and temporal heterogeneity from livestock grazing.
Funder
Hildebrand Foundation
Ken Leonard Fund for Livestock Interactions Research
Harvey Weil Foundation
Comision Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia
Houston Safari Club Foundation
South Texas Quail Coalition Chapter
Hill Country Quail Coalition
R. Stacy from Houston, TX
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference131 articles.
1. Allred BW, Bestelmeyer BT, Boyd CS, Brown C, Davies KW, Duniway MC, Ellsworth LM, Erickson TA, Fuhlendorf SD, Griffiths TV, Jansen V, Jones MO, Karl J, Knight A, Maestas JD, Maynard JJ, McCord SE, Naugle DE, Starns HD, Twidwell D, Uden DR (2021) Improving Landsat predictions of rangeland fractional cover with multitask learning and uncertainty. Methods Ecol Evol 12:841–849
2. Amputu V, Knox N, Braun A, Heshmati S, Retzlaff R, Röder A, Tielbörger K (2023) Unmanned aerial systems accurately map rangeland condition indicators in a dryland savannah. Ecol Inform 75:102007
3. Bailey DW (2004) Management strategies for optimal grazing distribution and use of arid rangelands. J Anim Sci 82:E147–E153
4. Bailey DW, Gross JE, Laca EA, Rittenhouse LR, Coughenour MB, Swift DM, Sims PL (1996) Mechanisms that result in large herbivore grazing distribution patterns. J Range Manag 49:386–400
5. Bailey DW, Dumont B, Wallisdevries MF (1998) Utilization of heterogeneous grasslands by domestic herbivores: theory to management. Ann Zootech 47:321–333