Carbon pool dynamics after variable retention harvesting in Nothofagus pumilio forests of Tierra del Fuego

Author:

Chaves Jimena E.,Aravena Acuña Marie-Claire,Rodríguez-Souilla Julián,Cellini Juan M.,Rappa Nolan J.,Lencinas María V.,Peri Pablo L.,Martínez Pastur Guillermo J.ORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background It is necessary to determine the implications for managing forest stands using variable retention harvesting for maintaining carbon and for calculating the effects of different harvesting practices on above- and below-ground carbon balance in forest ecosystems. In this context, forest carbon management has gained more attention among managers and policy-makers during recent years. The aim of this study was to determine carbon pool dynamics in different forest ecosystem components after variable retention harvesting (VRH) to characterize the ecological stability and quantify the recovery rate through the years-after-harvesting (YAH). Methods Carbon pool compartmentalization of 14 different components was determined in 60 harvested and primary unmanaged forests during the first 18 YAH in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina). We compared them using uni- and multi-variate methods, relativizing the outputs with primary unmanaged forests. Results We determined the effectiveness to retain carbon components in post-harvested stands under different retention strategies (aggregated vs. dispersed). The balance among carbon pool components changed between managed and unmanaged stands across the YAH, and was directly related to the impact magnitude. Aggregated retention improved the ecological stability of the harvested areas, where the below-ground components were more stable than the above-ground components. The recovery rate was directly related to the post-harvesting natural dynamics of the stands. The studied period was not enough to fully recover the C levels of primary unmanaged forests, but VRH showed advantages to increase the C pools in the managed stands. Conclusions Promoting VRH can improve sustainable forestry at the landscape level and in the long term, generating positive synergies with biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services. This study provides important new insights into forest carbon management, in particular to setting standards in carbon projects and sets the groundwork for analysing the economics of the mentioned harvesting systems.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Ecological Modeling,Ecology

Reference101 articles.

1. Aalde H, Gonzalez P, Gytarsky M, Krug T, Kurz WA, Lasco RD, Martino DL, McConkey BG, Ogle SM, Paustian K, Raison J, Ravindranath NH, Schoene D, Smith P, Somogyi Z, Amstel A, van Verchot L (2006) Generic methodologies applicable to multiple land-use categories. IPCC Guidel Natl Greenh Gas Invent 4:1–59

2. Ameray A, Bergeron Y, Valeria O, Montoro Girona M, Cavard X (2021) Forest carbon management: a review of silvicultural practices and management strategies across boreal, temperate and tropical forests. Cur Rep 7:245–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-021-00151-w

3. Angelstam P, Albulescu C, Andrianambinina O, Aszalós R, Borovichev E, Cano Cardona W, Dobrynin D, Fedoriak M, Firm D, Hunter M, De Jong W, Lindenmayer D, Manton M, Monge J, Mezei P, Michailova G, Muñoz Brenes C, Martínez Pastur G, Petrova O, Petrov V, Pokorny B, Rafanoharana S, Rosas YM, Seymour B, Waeber P, Wilmé L, Yamelynets T, Zlatanov T (2021) Frontiers of protected areas versus forest exploitation: assessing habitat network functionality in 16 case study regions globally. Ambio 50:2286–2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01628-5

4. Argañaraz C, Martínez Pastur G, Ramírez M, Grismado C, Lencinas MV (2020) Ground-dwelling spiders and understory vascular plants on Fuegian austral forests: community responses to variable retention management and their association to natural ecosystems. For Ecol Manage 474:e118375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118375

5. Atencia ME (2003) Densidad de maderas (kg/m3) ordenadas por nombre común. INTI, CITEMA, Buenos Aires

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3