Soil organic carbon stocks in native forest of Argentina: a useful surrogate for mitigation and conservation planning under climate variability
-
Published:2024-01-05
Issue:1
Volume:13
Page:
-
ISSN:2192-1709
-
Container-title:Ecological Processes
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ecol Process
Author:
Peri Pablo L.ORCID, Gaitán Juan, Mastrangelo Matías, Nosetto Marcelo, Villagra Pablo E., Balducci Ezequiel, Pinazo Martín, Eclesia Roxana P., Von Wallis Alejandra, Villarino Sebastián, Alaggia Francisco, Polo Marina González, Manrique Silvina, Meglioli Pablo A., Rodríguez-Souilla Julián, Mónaco Martín, Chaves Jimena E., Medina Ariel, Gasparri Ignacio, Arnesi Eugenio Alvarez, Barral María Paula, von Müller Axel, Pahr Norberto M., Echevarria Josefina Uribe, Fernández Pedro, Morsucci Marina, López Dardo, Cellini Juan Manuel, Alvarez Leandro, Barberis Ignacio, Colomb Hernán, La Manna Ludmila, Barbaro Sebastián, Blundo Cecilia, Sirimarco Ximena, Cavallero Laura, Zalazar Gualberto, Pastur Guillermo Martínez
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The nationally determined contribution (NDC) presented by Argentina within the framework of the Paris Agreement is aligned with the decisions made in the context of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) on the reduction of emissions derived from deforestation and forest degradation, as well as forest carbon conservation (REDD+). In addition, climate change constitutes one of the greatest threats to forest biodiversity and ecosystem services. However, the soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks of native forests have not been incorporated into the Forest Reference Emission Levels calculations and for conservation planning under climate variability due to a lack of information. The objectives of this study were: (i) to model SOC stocks to 30 cm of native forests at a national scale using climatic, topographic and vegetation as predictor variables, and (ii) to relate SOC stocks with spatial–temporal remotely sensed indices to determine biodiversity conservation concerns due to threats from high inter-annual climate variability.
Methods
We used 1040 forest soil samples (0–30 cm) to generate spatially explicit estimates of SOC native forests in Argentina at a spatial resolution of approximately 200 m. We selected 52 potential predictive environmental covariates, which represent key factors for the spatial distribution of SOC. All covariate maps were uploaded to the Google Earth Engine cloud-based computing platform for subsequent modelling. To determine the biodiversity threats from high inter-annual climate variability, we employed the spatial–temporal satellite-derived indices based on Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) and land surface temperature (LST) images from Landsat imagery.
Results
SOC model (0–30 cm depth) prediction accounted for 69% of the variation of this soil property across the whole native forest coverage in Argentina. Total mean SOC stock reached 2.81 Pg C (2.71–2.84 Pg C with a probability of 90%) for a total area of 460,790 km2, where Chaco forests represented 58.4% of total SOC stored, followed by Andean Patagonian forests (16.7%) and Espinal forests (10.0%). SOC stock model was fitted as a function of regional climate, which greatly influenced forest ecosystems, including precipitation (annual mean precipitation and precipitation of warmest quarter) and temperature (day land surface temperature, seasonality, maximum temperature of warmest month, month of maximum temperature, night land surface temperature, and monthly minimum temperature). Biodiversity was influenced by the SOC levels and the forest regions.
Conclusions
In the framework of the Kyoto Protocol and REDD+, information derived in the present work from the estimate of SOC in native forests can be incorporated into the annual National Inventory Report of Argentina to assist forest management proposals. It also gives insight into how native forests can be more resilient to reduce the impact of biodiversity loss.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference120 articles.
1. Adhikari K, Hartemink AE, Minasny B, Kheir RB, Greve MB, Greve MH (2014) Digital mapping of soil organic carbon contents and stocks in Denmark. PLoS ONE 9(8):e105519 2. Bahl A, Hellack B, Balas M, Dinischiotu A, Wiemann M, Brinkmann J, Luch A, Renard BY, Haase A (2019) Recursive feature elimination in random forest classification supports nanomaterial grouping. NanoImpact 15:100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2019.100179 3. Balvanera P, Pfisterer A, Buchmann N, He JS, Nakashizuka T, Raffaelli D, Schmid B (2006) Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol Let 9(10):1146–1156 4. Bannari A, Morin D, Bonn F, Huete A (1995) A review of vegetation indices. Remote Sens Rev 13:95–120 5. Barbé M, Bouchard M, Fenton N (2020) Examining boreal forest resilience to temperature variability using bryophytes: forest type matters. Ecosphere 11(8):e03232
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|