Perspectives on the use of Virtual Reality within a public hospital setting: surveying knowledge, attitudes, and perceived utility among health care professionals

Abstract

Abstract Background Virtual reality (VR) is a burgeoning technology within healthcare, though routine implementation of VR within hospital settings remains limited. Health professionals are key stakeholders in knowledge translation, though limited research has explored their knowledge and attitudes towards using VR for different purposes within healthcare. This study aimed to scope health professionals’ knowledge of, and attitudes towards, the use of VR applications in a public hospital setting. Methods A cross-sectional survey of multidisciplinary health professionals (medical, nursing, allied health professionals) was conducted in a major metropolitan public hospital in Australia. The custom survey was comprised of 28 mixed categorical and free-text fields designed to scope levels of knowledge, prior experience, and interest in VR; the perceived utility of VR within a hospital context; and perceived barriers and enablers of VR use within the hospital setting. Data were analyzed via descriptive and non-parametric statistics. Results One hundred and thirty-seven health professionals participated (38% allied health, 37% nursing, 24% medical). The majority had no prior exposure to VR in clinical (95%) or recreational (67%) settings; and only 16% were aware of any clinical research evidence for VR. Despite limited awareness, participants expressed support for VR use in hospitals. 99% reported VR had potential utility in healthcare, most commonly for clinical simulations (81%), clinical education (80%) and as a physical therapy tool (68%). Participants identified multiple barriers to VR implementation most commonly relating to perceived cost, lack of required infrastructure, time, knowledge and technical skill. Prominent enablers related to increasing capability at provider and system levels. Participants’ familiarity with VR was associated with stronger support for its’ use (Rho = 0.4, p < 0.001). Conclusions Health professionals in the hospital workforce reported limited knowledge and familiarity with VR; yet they perceived VR had broad utility and expressed overall support for different VR applications within hospitals. Health professionals appear interested in VR though face multiple barriers to its use in a hospital context. Increasing capability among multidisciplinary health providers and the wider hospital system appear to be important considerations for the success of future VR implementation in public hospitals.