Author:
Mohammad Abolhasan Haseib,Mostafa Hossam Mohammed,Megaly Hasan Ibarhim,Mohamed Mohamed Zidan,Taha Mohamad Gaber,Abdelal Sherif M.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is considered a serious condition and has clinical challenges in diagnosis. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is considered the gold standard in PE diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced MRA also has a strong useful role in the diagnosis. Our study aims to assess the role of non-contrast MRA in diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism compared to either CT pulmonary angiography or contrast enhanced MRA.
Results
In total, 50 patients with PE confirmed by either CTPA or CE-MRA were included in this study. All patients underwent non-contrast MRPA during the three consecutive days after CTPA or at the same examination setting in CE-MRA. The results were compared and statistically analyzed.
The mean age of our study group was 47.80 ± 14.01 years. Males represented 56% (28/50) and females 44% (22/50). The per-vessel sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of non-contrast MRPA reached about 100% for each parameter at the level of the pulmonary trunk, main pulmonary and lobar arteries. At the segmental level, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy reached about 88%, 100%, and 94%, while at the subsegmental level, about 35%, 100%, and 66% respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of non-contrast MRPA regardless of the site were 84%, 100%, and 90% respectively.
Conclusions
Non-contrast pulmonary MRA has a high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of PE, especially in proximal pulmonary arteries. So, it can be used as an alternative to the CTA and CE-MRA, especially when the CTA and the use of gadolinium are contraindicated.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science,General Medicine
Reference14 articles.
1. Mudge CS, Healey TT, Ataly MK, Pezzullo JA (2013) Feasibility of detecting pulmonary embolism using non-contrast MRI. ISRN Radiol 263:271–278
2. Hosch W, Schlieter M, Ley S, Heye T, Kauczor HU, Libicher M (2014) Detection of acute pulmonary embolism: feasibility of diagnostic accuracy of MRI using a stepwise protocol. Emerg Radiol 21:151–158
3. Goldhaber SZ (1998) Pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 339(2):93–104
4. Lee AY, Ginsberg JS (1998) Laboratory diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 169:2078–2086
5. Christian F, Stefan OS, Maximilian FR (2016) MRI expands options in lung assessment. Diagn Imag 193:144–149