Abstract
Abstract
Background
2D digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is utilized qualitatively to assess blood velocity changes that occur during arterial interventions. Quantitative angiographic metrics, such as blood velocity, could be used to standardize endpoints during angiographic interventions.
Purpose
To assess the accuracy and precision of a quantitative 2D DSA (qDSA) technique and to determine its feasibility for in vivo measurements of blood velocity.
Materials and methods
A quantitative DSA technique was developed to calculate intra-procedural blood velocity. In vitro validation was performed by comparing velocities from the qDSA method and an ultrasonic flow probe in a bifurcation phantom. Parameters of interest included baseline flow rate, contrast injection rate, projection angle, and magnification. In vivo qDSA analysis was completed in five different branches of the abdominal aorta in two 50 kg swine and compared to 4D Flow MRI. Linear regression, Bland-Altman, Pearson’s correlation coefficient and chi squared tests were used to assess the accuracy and precision of the technique.
Results
In vitro validation showed strong correlation between qDSA and flow probe velocities over a range of contrast injection and baseline flow rates (slope = 1.012, 95% CI [0.989,1.035], Pearson’s r = 0.996, p < .0001). The application of projection angle and magnification corrections decreased variance to less than 5% the average baseline velocity (p = 0.999 and p = 0.956, respectively). In vivo validation showed strong correlation with a small bias between qDSA and 4D Flow MRI velocities for all five abdominopelvic arterial vessels of interest (slope = 1.01, Pearson’s r = 0.880, p = <.01, Bias = 0.117 cm/s).
Conclusion
The proposed method allows for accurate and precise calculation of blood velocities, in near real-time, from time resolved 2D DSAs.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference28 articles.
1. de Vries A, Engels P, Overtoom T et al (1984) Interobserver variability in assessing renal artery stenosis by digital subtraction angiography. Diagnostic Imaging Clin Med 53(6):277–281 PMID: 6391782
2. Frydrychowicz A, Landgraf B, Niespodzany E et al (2011) Four-dimensional velocity mapping of the hepatic and splanchnic vasculature with radial sampling at 3 tesla: A feasibility study in portal hypertension. J Magnetic Resonance Imaging 34(3):spcone. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22773
3. Gardiner G, Sullivan K, Halpern E et al (2004) Angiographic assessment of initial balloon angioplasty results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15(10):1081–1087. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rvi.0000137398.73970.d5
4. Gu T, Korosec F, Block W et al (2005) PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 26(4):743–749
5. Clemens M. Hentschke, Steffen Serowy, Gábor Janiga, Georg Rose, and Klaus D. Tönnies "Estimating blood flow velocity in angiographic image data", Proc. SPIE 7964, Medical Imaging 2011: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Modeling, 79640Y (1 March 2011); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.878019.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献