Author:
Rebelo Miguel,Serrano João,Paulo Rui,Duarte-Mendes Pedro,Santos Jorge,Honório Samuel,Petrica João
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The importance of physical activity in the first months of age is well known, however, with the evolution of the urban environment, the excessive workload of parents and the excessive time in growing up in kindergartens has limited this same free practice and little has been studied about this issue. In Portugal, there are institutions that provide oriented physical activity for their children, however, this is optional, which may create disadvantages in children’s motor skills in these ages.
Objective
The objective of the study isto verify if there are differences in the development of motor skills (global and fine) comparing children between 12 and 48 months who practice oriented physical activity (OPA) and children who do not.
Methods
Participated in this study, 400 children of both genders (28.14 ± 7.23 months). Two groups were created (the group that had oriented physical activity (30 min long and 2 times a week) and the group that didn’t have oriented physical activity). For a better understanding they were divided into 3 age groups (12–23, 24–35 and 36–48 months). Motor skills were assessed using the PDMS-2 scales, for 6 months, following the instrument’s application standards.
Results
In a first analysis, we found that the majority of children only start to practice oriented physical activity in institutions from 36 months of age, however, it is in the first months (from 12 to 35) that the greatest differences between the two groups can occur. The OPA group presented better results according to the mean values, in all motor skills. Differences between groups were most noticeable in Postural, locomotion and fine manipulation Skills (showing effect size: moderate and low).
Conclusions
We can conclude that a practice of oriented physical activity in the first 48 months is fundamental to the development of motor skills. It is in the first months (up to 36) that there are greater differences, but it is also where there are less children carrying out guided physical activity. This is an important factor, and is determinant to make institutions aware of this importance of this variable in child development.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference25 articles.
1. Barreiros J, Neto C. O Desenvolvimento Motor e o Género. Lisbon: Editions FMH; 2007.
2. Neto C. A Criança e a Atividade Desportiva. Revista Horizonte 1994,60, 203–6.
3. Barnett LM, Ridgers ND, Salmon J. Associations between Young Children’s Perceived and actual ball skill competence and physical activity. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18(2):167–71.
4. Fernandes AC, Viegas AA, Lacerda ACR, et al. Association between executive functions and gross motor skills in overweight/obese and eutrophic preschoolers: cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 2022;22:498. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03553-2.
5. Messerli-Bürgy N, Kakebeeke TH, Meyer AH, et al. Walking onset: a poor predictor for motor and cognitive skills in healthy preschool children. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21:367. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02828-4.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献