Author:
Abtahi Hamidreza,Gholamzadeh Marsa,Baharii Roza
Abstract
Abstract
Background
National Persian school-aged twin registry was established to provide a platform for twin studies. In this report, we describe defining registry characteristics, database design, and preliminary results regarding gathered data in the first phase of the registry program.
Method
Through focus group discussions, the required data elements to design the database and data collection process were defined. First, a list of twins in school-aged groups was retrieved from the electronic database of the Ministry of Education. Tehran schools were selected for the first phase of our registry. Standard “Pea-in-Pods” questionnaire and twins’ similarity questionnaires were filled out by the parents themselves in addition to demographic information. Data were analyzed using SPSS v.22.
Results
The first national school-aged twin registry was established in 2018. Firstly, the required data sets and data collection process were defined using focus group discussions. At the country level, the initial information on 189,738 students was retrieved from the national database of the Ministry of Education. They were born between 2003 and 2017, of which 94,997 are boys (50.1%) and 94,741 are girls (49.9%). Of them, a total of 5,642 pairs of school-aged twins participated in the first phase of our program. Our sample size comprised 9772 twins, 906 triples, and 92 quadruplets. The analysis of the zygosity questionnaire showed that 14% of twin pairs were identified as monozygotic twins.
Conclusion
Recruiting school-aged twins through school health assistants leads to high enrollment and decreasing costs for the twin registry. The study showed a high rate of dizygotic twins that need to be verified by twin bio-sample in the next phase of studies.
Funder
Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference38 articles.
1. Boomsma D, Busjahn A, Peltonen L. Classical twin studies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3(11):872–82.
2. Medda E, Toccaceli V, Fagnani C, Nisticò L, Brescianini S, Salemi M, Ferri M, D’Ippolito C, Alviti S, Arnofi A, et al. The Italian twin registry: an update at 18 years from its inception. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2019;22(6):572–8.
3. Galton F. The history of twins, as a criterion of the relative powers of nature and nurture. Fraser’s Magazine. 1875;12(71):566–76.
4. Sahu M, Prasuna JG. Twin studies: a unique epidemiological tool. Indian J Community Med. 2016;41(3):177.
5. Skytthe A, Kyvik K, Bathum L, Holm N, Vaupel JW, Christensen K. The Danish twin registry in the new millennium. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2006;9(6):763–71.