Author:
Eyre Alison,Cohen Janice,Funnell Sarah,James Lynsey,Guglani Sheena,Abi Haidar Hounaida,Samson Lindy,Ward Michelle,Jetty Radha,Harrison Megan,Lyons John S.,Fraser-Roberts Leigh,Bennett Susan,Archibald Douglas,Khorsand Soha,Audcent Tobey
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Complex social determinants of health may not be easily recognized by health care providers and pose a unique challenge in the vulnerable pediatric population where patients may not be able to advocate for themselves. The goal of this study was to examine the acceptability and feasibility of health care providers using an integrated brief pediatric screening tool in primary care and hospital settings.
Methods
The framework of the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths (CANS) and Pediatric Intermed tools was used to inform the selection of items for the 9-item Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths-Pediatric Complexity Indicator (CANS-PCI). The tool consisted of three domains: biological, psychological, and social. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with health care providers in pediatric medical facilities in Ottawa, Canada. A low inference and iterative thematic synthesis approach was used to analyze the qualitative interview data specific to acceptability and feasibility.
Results
Thirteen health care providers participated in interviews. Six overarching themes were identified: acceptability, logistics, feasibility, pros/cons, risk, and privacy. Overall, participants agreed that a routine, trained provider-led pediatric tool for the screening of social determinants of health is important (n = 10, 76.9%), acceptable (n = 11; 84.6%), and feasible (n = 7, 53.8%).
Interpretation
Though the importance of social determinants of health are widely recognized, there are limited systematic methods of assessing, describing, and communicating amongst health care providers about the biomedical and psychosocial complexities of pediatric patients. Based on this study’s findings, implementation of a brief provider-led screening tool into pediatric care practices may contribute to this gap.
Funder
PRIME Grant, Department of Family Medicine of the Faculty of Medicine
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health: final report: executive summary, https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/69832 (2008, accessed February 11 2022).
2. World Health Organization. Social determinants of health, https://www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health#tab=tab_1 (2024, accessed February 26 2024).
3. Brown DW, Anda RF, Tiemeier H, et al. Adverse childhood experiences and the risk of premature mortality. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37:389–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.021.
4. Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The adverse childhood experiences (ACE) study. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14:245–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00017-8.
5. Ford-Jones EL, Williams R, Bertrand J. Social paediatrics and early child development: part 1. Paediatr Child Health. 2008;13:755–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/13.9.755.