Mid-term outcomes of right subaxillary approach versus median sternotomy incision for ventricular septal defect with patent ductus arteriosus

Author:

Qiu Zhi-Huang,Wu Qing-Song,Xiao Jun,Chai Tian-Ci,Tang Mi-Rong,Xie Xian-Biao,Liao Dong-Shao,Chen Liang-Wan

Abstract

Abstract Background This study aimed to evaluate and compare two surgical approaches to repair ventricular septal defect (VSD) with patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and to explore the patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods We conducted a retrospective study of all patients who had surgical repair of VSD and PDA between 2013 and 2015 using the right subaxillary approach (group A) or the median sternotomy incision (group B). The outcomes of both techniques were compared. Paediatric QoL Inventory 4.0 scale was applied to assess patients’ HRQoL in the 6th postoperative year. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to explore factors associated with higher HRQoL scores. Results A total of 128 patients were included (group A, n = 70 and group B, n = 58). Patients in group A were older and heavier than patients in group B. In group B, the diameters of VSD and PDA were larger and the pulmonary artery pressures were higher than those in group A (p < 0.001). No mortality occurred on a mean follow-up of 8.3 ± 1.2 years. Patients in group A had higher HRQoL scores than those in group B in terms of emotional and social functioning dimensions. The right subaxillary approach (OR: 3.56; 95% CI 1.65–5.46), higher parents’ education level (OR: 1.62; 95% CI 0.65–2.31), and better family economic status (OR: 1.48; 95% CI 0.79–2.45) were associated with higher HRQoL scores. Conclusions Younger and smaller patients receiving median sternotomy incisions due to large defects and pulmonary hypertension had lower HRQoL scores. The right subaxillary approach, higher parents’ education level, and better family economic status were associated with higher HRQoL scores.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3