Target product profiles for neonatal care devices: systematic development and outcomes with NEST360 and UNICEF

Author:

Kirby Rebecca P.ORCID,Molyneux Elizabeth M.,Dube Queen,McWhorter Cindy,Bradley Beverly D.,Gartley Martha,Oden Z. Maria,Richards-Kortum Rebecca,Werdenberg-Hall Jennifer,Kumara Danica,Liaghati-Mobarhan Sara,Heenan Megan,Bond Meaghan,Ezeaka Chinyere,Salim Nahya,Irimu Grace,Palamountain Kara M.,Manasyan Albert,Worm Anna,Zuechner Antke,Chepkemoi Audrey,Tembo Bentry,Trubo Casey,Mudenyanga Chishamiso,Wald Daniel,Goldfarb David,Gicheha Edith,Asma Elizabeth,Ciccone Emily,Mbale Emmie,Gheorghe Florin,Dumont Guy,Naburi Helga,Pernica Jeffrey,Appiah John,Strysko Jonathan,Langton Josephine,Lawn Joy,Klein Kate,Kawaza Kondwani,Gandrup-Marino Kristoffer,Lloyd Lizel,Woo Kinshella Maggie,Chise Mamiki,Myszkowski Marc,Mkony Martha Franklin,Waiyego Mary,Khoory Matthew,Medvedev Melissa,Chiume Msandeni,Spotswood Naomi,Mataruse Noah,Lufesi Norman,Lincetto Ornella,Lavoie Pascal,Mbuthia Rachel,Chifisi Rhoda,Owino Rita,Moshiro Robert,Mbwasi Ronald,Akech Sam,Shah Sona,Reschwamm Steffen,Adudans Steve,Mogotsi Thabiso,Karlen Walter,Demeke Zelalem,

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundMedical devices are critical to providing high-quality, hospital-based newborn care, yet many of these devices are unavailable in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and are not designed to be suitable for these settings. Target Product Profiles (TPPs) are often utilised at an early stage in the medical device development process to enable user-defined performance characteristics for a given setting. TPPs can also be applied to assess the profile and match of existing devices for a given context.MethodsWe developed initial TPPs for 15 newborn product categories for LMIC settings. A Delphi-like process was used to develop the TPPs. Respondents completed an online survey where they scored their level of agreement with each of the proposed performance characteristics for each of the 15 devices. Characteristics with < 75% agreement between respondents were discussed and voted on usingMentimeter™at an in-person consensus meeting.FindingsThe TPP online survey was sent to 180 people, of which 103 responded (57%). The majority of respondents were implementers/clinicians (51%, 53/103), with 50% (52/103) from LMIC. Across the 15 TPPs, 403 (60%) of the 668 performance characteristics did not achieve > 75% agreement. Areas of disagreement were voted on by 69 participants at an in-person consensus meeting, with consensus achieved for 648 (97%) performance characteristics. Only 20 (3%) performance characteristics did not achieve consensus, most (15/20) relating to quality management systems. UNICEF published the 15 TPPs in April 2020, accompanied by a report detailing the online survey results and consensus meeting discussion, which has been viewed 7,039 times (as of January 2023).ConclusionsThese 15 TPPs can inform developers and enable implementers to select neonatal care products for LMIC. Over 2,400 medical devices and diagnostics meeting these TPPs have been installed in 65 hospitals in Nigeria, Tanzania, Kenya, and Malawi through the NEST360 Alliance. Twenty-three medical devices identified and qualified by NEST360 meet nearly all performance characteristics across 11 of the 15 TPPs. Eight of the 23 qualified medical devices are available in the UNICEF Supply Catalogue. Some developers have adjusted their technologies to meet these TPPs. There is potential to adapt the TPP process beyond newborn care.

Funder

John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation

Children's Investment Fund Foundation

ELMA Foundation

Lemelson Foundation

Sall Family Foundation

Ting Tsung and Wei Fong Chao Family Foundation

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference40 articles.

1. UN-Interagency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. Levels and trends in child mortality: Report 2022.  New York: UN-IGME; 2023

2. World Health Organization (WHO). Ending Preventable Newborn Deaths and Stillbirths by 2030. WHO. Geneva: Unicef; 2020.

3. Dickson KE, Simen-Kapeu A, Kinney MV, Huicho L, Vesel L, Lackritz E, et al. Every Newborn: health-systems bottlenecks and strategies to accelerate scale-up in countries. Lancet. 2014;384(9941):438–54.

4. Thairu L, Wirth M, Lunze K. Innovative newborn health technology for resource-limited environments. Tropical Med Int Health. 2013;18(1):117–28.

5. United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Unicef; 2015. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3