Baby-box schemes in England: parent and practitioner experiences, and recommendations

Author:

Ball Helen L.,Taylor Catherine E.

Abstract

Abstract Background Programmes offering carboard baby boxes to parents in England began in some NHS Trusts in 2016. This study aimed to examine the strengths and weaknesses of English baby-box schemes as experienced by healthcare providers and parents. Methods An independent mixed-methods evaluation was conducted via telephone interviews and online surveys with healthcare providers and parents in all 7/9 NHS regions of England where baby-box schemes were established 2016–2019. Participants responded to requests circulated electronically by NHS Research & Design Departments, and infant health organisations in England. The objectives were to identify how parents and healthcare providers understood and experienced baby-box schemes implemented in England to date, and to produce recommendations for organisations considering involvement in future schemes. Results Baby-box schemes changed over time, and were complex to run and monitor. Both parents and practitioners were misinformed about their purpose and origins. Partnerships with a commercial box-provider reduced the investment needed to run a baby-box scheme, and offered potential benefits to staff regarding engagement with families via online education and face-to-face contact around handover of boxes, but carried unforeseen costs. Of particular concern was the box-provider’s access to parent personal details being promoted by NHS staff and parents’ lack of awareness; the hidden costs incurred by NHS facilities of running a box-scheme; and the costs incurred by parents in accessing their ‘free’ box. Sixteen recommendations are proposed for healthcare providers and organisations considering commercial - health-provider baby-box partnerships in future. Conclusions Many assumptions exist about the origins and purpose of baby-boxes; this misinformation needs correcting, especially as it relates to infant death reduction and safe infant sleep. Baby-box schemes take multiple forms from those motivated by social welfare to those motivated by commercial profit. The English experience of partnership schemes between healthcare facilities and commercial box-providers reveals some success stories, along with multiple points of ambiguity, unanticipated difficulty, and concerns for infant safety.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference31 articles.

1. Lullaby Trust. Our policy statement on baby boxes to sleep babies. Lullabytrust.org.uk. 2018. Available from: https://www.lullabytrust.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/baby-box-statement.docx. Accessed 7 Nov 2019.

2. UNICEF UK BFI. Statement on Baby Box Schemes. Unicef.org.uk. 2017. Available from: https://www.unicef.org.uk/babyfriendly/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/11/Statement-on-Baby-Box-Schemes-Unicef-UK-Baby-Friendly-Initiative.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2019.

3. Royal College of Midwives. Position Statement: Baby Boxes. Rcm.org.uk. 2018. Available from: https://www.rcm.org.uk/media/3415/baby-boxes_2.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2019.

4. Scottish Government. Scotland’s baby box - mygov.scot. Mygov.scot. 2018. Available from: https://www.mygov.scot/baby-box/. Accessed 7 Nov 2019.

5. Murphy M. England launches Baby Box initiative. Independentnurse.co.uk. 2016. Available from: http://www.independentnurse.co.uk/professional-article/england-launches-baby-box-initiative/142866/. Accessed 7 Nov 2019.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3