Abstract
Abstract
Background
Accurate anthropometric measurements are essential for assessing nutritional status, monitoring child growth, and informing clinical care. We aimed to improve height measurements of hospitalized pediatrics patients through implementation of gold standard measurement techniques.
Methods
A quality improvement project implemented computerized training modules on anthropometry and standardized wooden boards for height measurements in a tertiary children’s hospital. Heights were collected pre- and post-intervention on general pediatric inpatients under 5 years of age. Accuracy of height measurements was determined by analyzing the variance and by comparing to World Health Organization’s defined biologically plausible height-for-age z-scores. Qualitative interviews assessed staff attitudes.
Results
Ninety-six hospital staff completed the anthropometry training. Data were available on 632 children pre- and 933 post-intervention. Training did not increase the proportion of patients measured for height (78.6% pre-intervention vs. 75.8% post-intervention, p = 0.19). Post-intervention, wooden height boards were used to measure height of 34.8% patients, while tape measures and wingspan accounted for 42.0% and 3.5% of measurements, respectively. There was no improvement in the quality of height measurements based on plausibility (approximately 3% height-for-age z-scores measurements flagged out of range pre- and post-intervention), digit preference (13.4% of digits pre- and 12.3% post-intervention requiring reclassification), or dispersion of measurements (height-for-age z-scores standard deviation 1.9 pre- and post-intervention). Staff reported that using the wooden board was too labor consuming and cumbersome.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that efforts to improve anthropometric measurements of hospitalized children have multiple obstacles, and further investigation of less cumbersome methods of measurements may be warranted.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Reference21 articles.
1. Suchdev PS. What pediatricians can do to address malnutrition globally and at home. Pediatrics. 2017;139(2):e20161666.
2. Becker PJ, Nieman Carney L, Corkins MR, et al. Consensus statement of the academy of nutrition and dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: indicators recommended for the identification and documentation of pediatric malnutrition (undernutrition). J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114:1988–2000.
3. Johnson W, Cameron N, Dickson P, et al. The reliability of routine anthropometric data collected by health workers: a cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46:310–6.
4. Wit JM, Himes JH, van Buuren S, Denno DM, Suchdev PS. Practical Application of Linear Growth Measurements in Clinical Research in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Horm Res Paediatr. 2017;88(1):79–90.
5. World Health Organization. Wolrd Health Organization (WHO) Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards: Length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age: Methods and development. 2006.